Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Diagnosing and managing staff performance
Nick Steele BSc

Diagnosing the performance of your staff is a key factor in a successful business


Nick Steele BSc National Consulting Manager Zoetis UK Ltd talked about diagnosis and managing staff performance in the Business Theatre at the London Vet Show this morning.

Diagnosing the performance of your staff is a key factor in a successful business. Nick Steele outlined the key factors to consider when diagnosing the performance of practice staff.

The two basic areas to consider are observable behaviour and competency. He pointed out that although you can assess performance by results (ie. output),  diagnosing by behaviour (ie. input) is just as important.

Behaviour can be a difficult area to measure, particularly because of our own perceptions - the 'horn or halo' effect

Observable behaviour is behaviour that is observed by the manager on more than one occasion. It must be consistently demonstrated and competency based (i.e. compared to the behaviour that has been set as a standard by the practice).

Competency is most easily assessed using the four-step competency ladder:

Step 1 - staff are unconsciously incompetent - they are not aware of what skills or knowledge they lack

Step 2 - staff are consciously incompetent - they are now aware of what they do not know

Step 3 - staff are consciously competent - they are aware of their skills and knowledge

Step 4- staff are unconsciously competent - they simply do the job using their experience.

It is important that those staff at step four  are constantly challenged so that they do not become stale and fail to develop further. Managers need to understand the relationship between skill and will, which once identified can be used in staff motivation.

The 'skill versus will' matrix identifies those staff who have high skills and high wills -  these are the staff most important to your business. Those staff with high wills and low skills are also important, as their skills can be developed. However, staff with high skills but low wills, and those with low skills and wills, are those members of the practice who need further diagnosis. These are the staff who may not be staying with the practice much longer if their motivation levels cannot be improved.

We can give our staff skills and knowledge, but their attitude can be much more of a problem. If ultimately attitude and behaviour cannot be altered to fit in with the requirement of the practice, it has to be time to go for that member of staff.

Diagnosing and managing staff performance is time consuming but necessary, and by following some simple rules can have a dramatic impact of the effectiveness of the practice.

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Practices urged to audit neutering data

News Story 1
 RCVS Knowledge has called on vet practices to audit their post-operative neutering outcomes.

It follows the release of the 2024 NASAN benchmarking report, which collates data from neutering procedures performed on dogs, cats and rabbits.

The benchmarking report enables practices in the UK and Ireland to compare their post-operative outcomes to the national average. This includes the rate of patients lost to follow-up, which in 2024 increased to 23 per cent.

Anyone from the practice can submit the data using a free template. The deadline for next report is February 2026.

Visit the RCVS Knowledge website to complete an audit. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
UK's BSE risk status downgraded

The WOAH has downgraded the UK's international risk status for BSE to 'negligible'.

Defra says that the UK's improved risk status recognises the reputation for having the highest standards for biosecurity. It adds that it demonstrates decades of rigorous animal control.

Outbreaks of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, also known as mad cow disease, have previously resulted in bans on Britain's beef exports.

The UK's new status could lead to expanded trade and better confidence in British beef.

Christine Middlemiss, the UK's chief veterinary officer, said: "WOAH's recognition of the UK as negligible risk for BSE is a significant milestone and is a testament to the UK's strong biosecurity measures and the hard work and vigilance of farmers and livestock keepers across the country who have all played their part in managing the spread of this disease.