Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Cow hormone treatments could reduce global warming
Dairy cow
For an 'average' UK herd there would be a reduction in methane emissions equivalent to the global warming potential of two cars.

Significant reduction in methane emissions

Targeted use of hormone treatments could make the dairy industry more efficient and cut greenhouse gas emissions, according to research by the University of Nottingham.

The research, published in PLOS ONE, suggests that routine hormone treatments could improve efficiency by getting more cows pregnant sooner

Dr Simon Archer, who led the study said: "This is better for the environment as for every litre of milk produce; fewer animals would be needed, which generates less waste. This applies for any breed of cow and to the majority of farms, except those that are already exceptionally well-managed."

Scientists predict that by 2050, the growth in the size and wealth of populations will lead to an unprecedented demand for animal produce. Due to limitations on natural resources, the rise in agricultural productivity needed to meet this demand must be environmentally sustainable.

One way to meet these objectives is to carry out routine hormone treatments in dairy cows to aid reproduction, however the practice has raised ethical concerns. It is therefore important that their use can be justified.

Dr Archer and his team carried out a computer simulation of individual cows from 10,000 dairy herds to compare traditional reproduction management with what may happen if routine hormone treatment programmes were adopted for a short time when cows first became eligible to breed.

They found that for an 'average' UK herd there would be a reduction in methane emissions equivalent to the global warming potential of two cars, a family home, or 21 barrels of oil.

"The farmer would also save at least £50 per cow in production costs," added Dr Archer.

The study concluded that the routine hormonal treatments tested would be financially viable on many farms and would also benefit society by reducing global warming and ensuring the continued availability of affordable milk.

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Practices urged to audit neutering data

News Story 1
 RCVS Knowledge has called on vet practices to audit their post-operative neutering outcomes.

It follows the release of the 2024 NASAN benchmarking report, which collates data from neutering procedures performed on dogs, cats and rabbits.

The benchmarking report enables practices in the UK and Ireland to compare their post-operative outcomes to the national average. This includes the rate of patients lost to follow-up, which in 2024 increased to 23 per cent.

Anyone from the practice can submit the data using a free template. The deadline for next report is February 2026.

Visit the RCVS Knowledge website to complete an audit. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
UK's BSE risk status downgraded

The WOAH has downgraded the UK's international risk status for BSE to 'negligible'.

Defra says that the UK's improved risk status recognises the reputation for having the highest standards for biosecurity. It adds that it demonstrates decades of rigorous animal control.

Outbreaks of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, also known as mad cow disease, have previously resulted in bans on Britain's beef exports.

The UK's new status could lead to expanded trade and better confidence in British beef.

Christine Middlemiss, the UK's chief veterinary officer, said: "WOAH's recognition of the UK as negligible risk for BSE is a significant milestone and is a testament to the UK's strong biosecurity measures and the hard work and vigilance of farmers and livestock keepers across the country who have all played their part in managing the spread of this disease.