Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Genetically-modified micropigs to be sold as pets
Small pigs
Any profits BGI make from the sale of the micro-pigs will be invested back into research into how to regulate the various applications of gene editing.

Sparks debate between scientists and animal rights groups

Micropigs created by scientists in China using genetic editing techniques will be sold as pets in the near future, according to a Guardian report.  The idea has sparked a heated debate between scientists and animal rights groups.

Scientists at the Beijing Genomics Institute (BGI) outlined their work in the journal Nature last week. The micro-pigs were created originally as models for human disease, by applying a gene editing technique to a small breed of pig known as a Bama.  However, last month BGI revealed that it would start selling the pigs as pets.

When mature, the micropigs weigh around 15kg - roughly the same as a medium-sized dog. They will be sold for 10,000 yuan each, which is around £1,000. In addition, customers will be able to chose the pig's coat colour pattern, which can also be achieved by manipulating its genetic make up.

Horrified with the idea, Dr Penny Hawkins, head of the RSPCA's animals department told the Observer: “The idea is completely unacceptable. In the past, pets have been bred by selecting animals, generation by generation, to produce a desired trait. Inducing a massive change in one go risks creating animals that suffer all sorts of horrific impairments.”

She adds: “We have to move away from the idea that we can pick our companion animals purely because of their cuteness and size. The idea of creating micropigs is a very big step in the wrong direction.”

Geneticist Jens Boch at the Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg in Germany also warns against the practice. Speaking to Nature, he says: “It's questionable whether we should impact the life, health and well-being of other animal species on this planet light-heartedly.”

However, other scientists say there should be no reason not to take the idea of genetically modified pets as a serious concept.

Biologist Williard Eyeston of Virginia State University told the Guardian: “If the micropig is carefully evaluated and found to be equal in health compared to a normal pig and differs only in terms of size, there would be little scientific reason to block it from being offered as a pet.”

According to Nature, any profits BGI make from the sale of the micropigs will be invested back into research into how to regulate the various applications of gene editing.  

“We plan to take orders from customers now and see what the scale of the demand is,” says BGI technical director Yong Li.

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Practices urged to audit neutering data

News Story 1
 RCVS Knowledge has called on vet practices to audit their post-operative neutering outcomes.

It follows the release of the 2024 NASAN benchmarking report, which collates data from neutering procedures performed on dogs, cats and rabbits.

The benchmarking report enables practices in the UK and Ireland to compare their post-operative outcomes to the national average. This includes the rate of patients lost to follow-up, which in 2024 increased to 23 per cent.

Anyone from the practice can submit the data using a free template. The deadline for next report is February 2026.

Visit the RCVS Knowledge website to complete an audit. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
UK's BSE risk status downgraded

The WOAH has downgraded the UK's international risk status for BSE to 'negligible'.

Defra says that the UK's improved risk status recognises the reputation for having the highest standards for biosecurity. It adds that it demonstrates decades of rigorous animal control.

Outbreaks of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, also known as mad cow disease, have previously resulted in bans on Britain's beef exports.

The UK's new status could lead to expanded trade and better confidence in British beef.

Christine Middlemiss, the UK's chief veterinary officer, said: "WOAH's recognition of the UK as negligible risk for BSE is a significant milestone and is a testament to the UK's strong biosecurity measures and the hard work and vigilance of farmers and livestock keepers across the country who have all played their part in managing the spread of this disease.