Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Pilot ban on horse tethering recommended
tethered horse
The charity, Friends of Swansea Horses (FOSH), said tethering comes with serious welfare concerns.
Current situation 'cannot continue', Swansea working group says
 
A pilot scheme should be introduced to ban horse tethering on public land in one part of Swansea, a working group has said. The recommendation follows serious concerns about horse welfare in the area.

If successful, the scheme could be rolled out across Swansea.

In a letter to cabinet members, the Tethered Horses Scrutiny Working Group wrote: 'The suffering of many horses kept on tethers on council land is not acceptable. We heard enough examples of neglect and cruelty to convince us that the current situation cannot be allowed to continue and that something needs to be done'.

Evidence submitted by animal charities, the police and Trading Standards showed strong arguments both for and against the implementation of a ban. The charity, Friends of Swansea Horses (FOSH), said tethering comes with serious welfare concerns, as well as loss of public amenity, community conflicts and a poor public image for Swansea. The council currently spends a significant amount of money dealing with neglect and cruelty by impounding the affected horses.

However, some were concerned that a ban may not be practical or affordable. A Trading Standards officer said there are too many horses to implement a zero tolerance approach across the city and county. With the council facing serious financial challenges, cost implications cannot be taken lightly, the working group wrote.

Another worry is what will happen to horses that are impounded if a ban is introduced. Their fate is currently unclear but it is thought that many would need to be euthanised.

The Community Horse and Pony Scheme (CHAPS) felt a ban would be counterproductive for welfare and could lead to horses being kept in unsuitable stables such as garden sheds, meaning those that are mistreated would become invisible. Due to the low cost of purchasing a horse, owners can easily replace horses that have been impounded.

What the organisations are agreed on, however, is that the current situation cannot continue. Due to the potential risks and costs, the working group is recommending a pilot in just one area of Swansea, incorporating both education and enforcement.

While the issue is 'complex and challenging' and there are 'no easy answers', the working group have recommended a joint approach of enforcement and education. This includes communicating and engaging with members of the public, liaising with rescue and rehoming organisations, education and support for responsible owners and the use of council land for regulated grazing.

A response from the cabinet is expected by 11 May.

For more information on the group's recommendations, visit:
http://www.swansea.gov.uk/article/25363/Tethered-Horses-Working-Group-Letter-to-Cabinet-member-20-April-2016

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Strangles survey seeks views of horse owners

News Story 1
 With Strangles Awareness Week just around the corner (5-11 May), vets are being encouraged to share a survey about the disease with their horse-owning clients.

The survey, which has been designed by Dechra, aims to raise awareness of Strangles and promote best practices to prevent its transmission. It includes questions about horse owners' experiences of strangles, together with preventative measures and vaccination.

Respondents to the survey will be entered into a prize draw to win two VIP tickets to Your Horse Live 2025. To access the survey, click here 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
DAERA to reduce BVD 'grace period'

DAERA has reminded herd keepers of an upcoming reduction to the 'grace period' to avoid BVD herd restrictions.

From 1 May 2025, herd keepers will have seven days to cull any BVD positive or inconclusive animals to avoid restrictions being applied to their herd.

It follows legislation introduced on 1 February, as DAERA introduces herd movement restrictions through a phased approach. Herd keepers originally had 28 days to cull BVD positive or inconclusive animals.

DAERA says that, providing herd keepers use the seven-day grace period, no herds should be restricted within the first year of these measures.

Additional measures, which will target herds with animals over 30 days old that haven't been tested for BVD, will be introduced from 1 June 2025.

More information is available on the DAERA website.