Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Councils may be able to ban live animal exports
sheep
"When local people own ports, like in Ramsgate, they ought to be able to ban the exportation of live animals for slaughter." (stock photo)

Ramsgate disaster prompts MP to introduce a bill
 
Councils may be given the power to ban live animal exports from ports they own, after Craig Mackinlay MP introduced a bill in the House of Commons on Tuesday (10 May).

Mr Mackinlay, MP for South Thanet, spoke of the tragic events at the Port of Ramsgate in September 2012, where dozens of sheep died or were euthanised.

When the AHVLA (now APHA) inspected the vehicle, they found it had been poorly loaded and overstocked. One sheep had a broken leg and many more were lame or had trapped limbs. Six lambs fell into the water when the floor collapsed, of which two died and four were rescued by the RSPCA.

Following the case, Thanet District Council suspended further shipments for a period of time, but was later found to have breached an 1847 law and ordered to pay compensation of more than £4 million.

"This ruling means that local people are powerless to end a practice that many find barbaric - councils cannot turn away live exports," Mr Mackinlay said.

"I think it's right that local people have a say in animal welfare standards in their area. When local people own ports, like in Ramsgate, they ought to be able to ban the exportation of live animals for slaughter, a practice many find barbaric."

During the 10 minute rule bill, however, Andrew Nuttall MP spoke against the proposal, saying that while the UK remains part of the EU, parliament is "powerless" to change the legislation in the manner proposed.

Nonetheless, a majority of MPs voted to bring the bill forward, allowing it to progress to the next stage.

 

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Practices urged to audit neutering data

News Story 1
 RCVS Knowledge has called on vet practices to audit their post-operative neutering outcomes.

It follows the release of the 2024 NASAN benchmarking report, which collates data from neutering procedures performed on dogs, cats and rabbits.

The benchmarking report enables practices in the UK and Ireland to compare their post-operative outcomes to the national average. This includes the rate of patients lost to follow-up, which in 2024 increased to 23 per cent.

Anyone from the practice can submit the data using a free template. The deadline for next report is February 2026.

Visit the RCVS Knowledge website to complete an audit. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
UK's BSE risk status downgraded

The WOAH has downgraded the UK's international risk status for BSE to 'negligible'.

Defra says that the UK's improved risk status recognises the reputation for having the highest standards for biosecurity. It adds that it demonstrates decades of rigorous animal control.

Outbreaks of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, also known as mad cow disease, have previously resulted in bans on Britain's beef exports.

The UK's new status could lead to expanded trade and better confidence in British beef.

Christine Middlemiss, the UK's chief veterinary officer, said: "WOAH's recognition of the UK as negligible risk for BSE is a significant milestone and is a testament to the UK's strong biosecurity measures and the hard work and vigilance of farmers and livestock keepers across the country who have all played their part in managing the spread of this disease.