Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Trophy hunting 'could help to conserve lions' - study
lion
"Increasing block fees, reducing trophy fees and reducing the hunting quota could bring in the same tax revenue, while reducing the temptation of hunters to kill more lions."
Overhaul of system needed to prioritise sustainability, not profits

Scientists from the UK and Australia say that controlled trophy hunting of lions could help to conserve the species, but an overhaul of the current system is needed.

Lions need large protected areas but managing this land is expensive; researchers say the operating budgets for protected areas in developing countries cover an average of just 30 per cent of the costs.

A year after an American dentist and recreational hunter killed Cecil the lion outside Hwange National Park in Zimbabwe, researchers from the Universities of Cambridge, Kent and Queensland studied lion population trends in Tanzania's Selous Game Reserve between 1996 and 2008.

Tanzania is Africa's main location for lion trophy hunting, and is also home to up to half the world's free-ranging lions. The game reserve is split into blocks in which hunting rights are allocated to different companies. The government leases land to the hunting companies, enforces hunting regulations and allocates a species-specific annual quota per block.

Under the current system blocks are sold off cheaply and further cash raised by setting high quotas and high fees for each trophy animal shot, explains senior author Professor Nigel Leader-Williams. This encourages companies that are allocated blocks for short periods (less than 10 years) to shoot more lions, researchers write in the journal PLOS ONE.

The team found that companies allocated a block for less than 10 years killed more lions, and more trophy species generally. Annual financial returns for these blocks were also higher. But for those allocated land for more than 10 years, the number of licensed lion kills were at a sustainable level for the species and also maintained their habitat.

Prof Leader-Williams, who is from Cambridge's department of geography, said: "Increasing block fees, reducing trophy fees and reducing the hunting quota could bring in the same tax revenue, while reducing the temptation of hunters to kill more lions."

First author Dr Henry Brink, from the University of Kent, called the findings "an important lesson" for lion conservation, as the species is increasingly restricted to protected areas due to loss of habitat.

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Voting opens for BEVA Council

News Story 1
 Eligible members of BEVA will be able to vote for their Council team until Monday, 17 August 2026. Members will have received an election email on 17 July.

There are five candidates standing for four available places on Council. They are:

  • Alexandre Triguino
  • Angela Jones
  • Beth Bryant
  • Holly Rees
  • Hugh Somerville
Full profiles for each candidate can be found on the BEVA website

Click here for more...
News Shorts
Milk recalled over presence of veterinary medicines

Graham's Family Dairy has issued a recall for its semi-skimmed milk due to the presence of veterinary medicines in the product.

In a risk statement, the Food Standards Agency said the presence of the medicines, including penicillin, make the milk unsafe to consume and 'may be a possible health risk for anyone with an allergy to antibiotics'.

Customers who bought the product are advised to return it to the store of purchase for a full refund.