Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

The importance of a social media policy
It is essential for a practice to have a social media policy incorporated into both the practice handbook and all employee contracts.
Employers are legally responsible for the actions of employees
 
Rebecca Leask and Charlotte Thornton-Smith gave a comprehensive lecture on the legal pitfalls of social media at the London Vet Show. They emphasised the need for a robust social media policy for the workplace and the importance of keeping it up to date.

They stressed the importance of employers understanding that they are legally responsible for the actions of their employees on social media. This is the case for employees both at work and outside work as they are still responsible for their employees' actions, even if work equipment is not being used to access social media.

It is essential for a practice to have a social media policy incorporated into both the practice handbook and all employee contracts. As well as making sure that employees are aware of their responsibilities, having a social media policy can be used in disciplinary proceedings, should it be necessary.

The policy should be based on the key features that could damage the practice. The questions to ask when formulating such a policy are:
  • What is the purpose of this policy?
  • What are the objectives of the policy?
  • What is our attitude towards how social media should be used by staff?
  • What can staff do and not do in relation to the use of social media both at work and at home?

Client use of social media was also discussed, as well as the importance of protecting the reputation of the practice. Client comments should always be monitored and generally speaking the good should be taken along with the bad. The vital thing is to respond appropriately. When necessary the comments made by clients should be brought to, and discussed at, staff meetings so that all staff are aware of both favourable and non-favourable comments and can act accordingly. Delegates were told to always thank those who post favourable reviews.

If there are problematic postings it is important to reply promptly; they should never be ignored. It is also wise to have a disclaimer on your site which allows you to remove abusive or very unjustified posts.

The use of social media is vital to the success of veterinary practices. Having policies in place on how to use it and not abuse it, and how to respond to its use by others is only common sense and will help to avoid the possibility of serious damage and legal implications.

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Practices urged to audit neutering data

News Story 1
 RCVS Knowledge has called on vet practices to audit their post-operative neutering outcomes.

It follows the release of the 2024 NASAN benchmarking report, which collates data from neutering procedures performed on dogs, cats and rabbits.

The benchmarking report enables practices in the UK and Ireland to compare their post-operative outcomes to the national average. This includes the rate of patients lost to follow-up, which in 2024 increased to 23 per cent.

Anyone from the practice can submit the data using a free template. The deadline for next report is February 2026.

Visit the RCVS Knowledge website to complete an audit. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
UK's BSE risk status downgraded

The WOAH has downgraded the UK's international risk status for BSE to 'negligible'.

Defra says that the UK's improved risk status recognises the reputation for having the highest standards for biosecurity. It adds that it demonstrates decades of rigorous animal control.

Outbreaks of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, also known as mad cow disease, have previously resulted in bans on Britain's beef exports.

The UK's new status could lead to expanded trade and better confidence in British beef.

Christine Middlemiss, the UK's chief veterinary officer, said: "WOAH's recognition of the UK as negligible risk for BSE is a significant milestone and is a testament to the UK's strong biosecurity measures and the hard work and vigilance of farmers and livestock keepers across the country who have all played their part in managing the spread of this disease.