Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

George Eustice answers questions on organophosphates
sheep
Compulsory annual sheep dipping ended in 1992.
Minister says further meeting with SDSSG 'would not be beneficial'

Defra minister George Eustice has said he will not meet the Sheep Dip Sufferers Support Group (SDSSG) again to discuss the health impacts of organophosphate (OP) sheep dips.

Mr Eustice met representatives from the group last year to hear concerns about farmers who say they have suffered ill health following the use of OPs, which farmers were required to use until 1992.

Responding to five written questions submitted by Neil Parish MP, Mr Eustice said: 'The Committee on Toxicity has looked at this issue exhaustively, examining 26 different studies over a period of more than a decade, and concluded that in the absence of acute poisoning there would not be meaningful long-term effects.

"To the best of my knowledge there is no new scientific evidence available that would alter this conclusion. I am sympathetic to farmers suffering from ill health but at this time I do not feel a further meeting would be beneficial."

Mr Eustice was asked to estimate the number of farmers that have reported illnesses relating to OP sheep dip exposure since 1990. The Veterinary Medicines Directorate (VMD) has recorded 634 reports of suspected adverse reactions in humans to OP dips since records began in 1985.

"To the best of the VMD's knowledge this is the most comprehensive dataset available," he added.

Mr Parish questioned the reasons for the introduction of the Sheep Scab (Revocation) Order 1992, which ended the compulsory annual sheep dipping requirement.

In a letter to Tom Rigby of the SDSSG in May, Mr Eustice stated that no evidence had been found to suggest that human health fears played a part in the decision to end compulsory dipping. Research by the independent Committee on Toxicity also found no evidence that low-level exposure causes long-term health effects, he noted.

Having searched 'hundreds of records stretching back to the 1980s', Mr Eustice said he had found 'documented evidence that compulsory dipping was ended because eradication of the disease had become unrealistic and individual outbreaks could be dealt with on a case-by-case basis.'

SDSSG last month called on MPs to launch an official inquiry into concerns that some farmers and farm workers were poisoned by OP sheep dips before the legal requirement to use them ended. The group is seeking better diagnosis and treatment for sufferers, as well as official recognition from the government. Symptoms reported range from nausea, headaches, flu-like signs and dizziness, to more long-term neurological effects.

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Practices urged to audit neutering data

News Story 1
 RCVS Knowledge has called on vet practices to audit their post-operative neutering outcomes.

It follows the release of the 2024 NASAN benchmarking report, which collates data from neutering procedures performed on dogs, cats and rabbits.

The benchmarking report enables practices in the UK and Ireland to compare their post-operative outcomes to the national average. This includes the rate of patients lost to follow-up, which in 2024 increased to 23 per cent.

Anyone from the practice can submit the data using a free template. The deadline for next report is February 2026.

Visit the RCVS Knowledge website to complete an audit. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
UK's BSE risk status downgraded

The WOAH has downgraded the UK's international risk status for BSE to 'negligible'.

Defra says that the UK's improved risk status recognises the reputation for having the highest standards for biosecurity. It adds that it demonstrates decades of rigorous animal control.

Outbreaks of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, also known as mad cow disease, have previously resulted in bans on Britain's beef exports.

The UK's new status could lead to expanded trade and better confidence in British beef.

Christine Middlemiss, the UK's chief veterinary officer, said: "WOAH's recognition of the UK as negligible risk for BSE is a significant milestone and is a testament to the UK's strong biosecurity measures and the hard work and vigilance of farmers and livestock keepers across the country who have all played their part in managing the spread of this disease.