Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Study to investigate less-invasive fish swabbing technique
The new technique involves gently stroking a swab (sterile cotton bud) along the flanks of the fish whilst the fish is held in a net.

Project to explore ways to improve fish welfare 

A University of Leicester scientist is set to investigate ways to improve the welfare of fish used in scientific research.

Dr William Norton from the University’s Department of Neuroscience aims to test the theory that swabbing has a significantly lower impact on stress-related behaviour and physiology than fin clipping.

“In this project, we will investigate the nature and magnitude of any welfare benefits of swabbing over fin clipping, explained Dr Norton. “Such information is essential to validate the swabbing technique and assure its wider adoption by the growing community of researchers that use fish as laboratory models.”

It is common practice for laboratories to collect DNA samples from fish. It is mostly done to confirm the genetic strain of fish, their population of origin, or whether an individual contains genes that are relevant to the research.

Typically, DNA sampling is performed by fin clipping, an invasive procedure carried out under non-terminal anaesthesia. A recent study found that of the estimated 3,250 zebrafish laboratories worldwide, 85 per cent use fin clipping to collect DNA.

The new technique involves gently stroking a swab (sterile cotton bud) along the flanks of the fish whilst the fish is held in a net. The process takes seconds and researchers have already confirmed that it collects enough DNA for analysis.

“While swabbing appears to be less invasive than fin clipping, it still requires fish to be netted, held in the air and handled; procedures that could potentially cause stress,” Dr Norton continued. “Therefore, the potential of swabbing as a refinement to standard DNA collection by fin clipping remains untested.”

Dr Ioanna Katsiadaki, a principal investigator at Cefas and an expert in the assessment of fish welfare, will collaborate on the project and provide state-of-the-art facilities for the less-invasive measurement of stress hormones released naturally by fish into the water through their gills.
 
The project, 'Quantifying the potential of skin swabbing as a refinement for DNA sampling of laboratory fish', will be funded by the National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research.

Image (C) University of Leicester

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Practices urged to audit neutering data

News Story 1
 RCVS Knowledge has called on vet practices to audit their post-operative neutering outcomes.

It follows the release of the 2024 NASAN benchmarking report, which collates data from neutering procedures performed on dogs, cats and rabbits.

The benchmarking report enables practices in the UK and Ireland to compare their post-operative outcomes to the national average. This includes the rate of patients lost to follow-up, which in 2024 increased to 23 per cent.

Anyone from the practice can submit the data using a free template. The deadline for next report is February 2026.

Visit the RCVS Knowledge website to complete an audit. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
UK's BSE risk status downgraded

The WOAH has downgraded the UK's international risk status for BSE to 'negligible'.

Defra says that the UK's improved risk status recognises the reputation for having the highest standards for biosecurity. It adds that it demonstrates decades of rigorous animal control.

Outbreaks of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, also known as mad cow disease, have previously resulted in bans on Britain's beef exports.

The UK's new status could lead to expanded trade and better confidence in British beef.

Christine Middlemiss, the UK's chief veterinary officer, said: "WOAH's recognition of the UK as negligible risk for BSE is a significant milestone and is a testament to the UK's strong biosecurity measures and the hard work and vigilance of farmers and livestock keepers across the country who have all played their part in managing the spread of this disease.