Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Psychology for leaders
Stress is an increasing problem at work and coaching can be a great help, said Kim Morgan, managing director of Barefoot Coaching.
How your management style affects your team 

Managers are not taught enough psychology, was the message Kim Morgan, managing director of Barefoot Coaching, gave to delegates at the London Vet Show.

It is now accepted that your direct manager has a huge (up to 70 per cent) effect on how you feel at work and this can have a direct effect on your performance.

There are six main styles of management: coercive, visionary, affiliation, democratic, pacesetting and coaching and it is important to use the right style at the right time - even if, as a manager, you veer towards one particular management style. Good leaders need to know their own management default style and be aware of how this affects the people they lead.

Stress is an increasing problem at work and coaching can be a great help to people who are stressed. Stress can be very debilitating, causing ‘all or nothing’ thinking, closed mindsets and a ‘win or lose’ mentality - none of which help in a work situation.

It has been found that just giving people some attention will help to reduce their stress. Giving each person attention at the beginning of team meetings by providing them with three minutes to say what they wish to say has been found to be highly productive.

Praise and appreciation are basic human needs and if given will help to motivate most individuals. In the same way we are far more likely to do something if we 'own' it rather than just being told to 'do' it. We are programmed not to like change so just telling someone to do something is unlikely to be successful

Motivating people should not be viewed as a ‘one size fits all’ exercise, Kim said. It is important to find out what it is that motivates them and then provide the appropriate motivation and rewards. For most people, achievement, affiliation and influence are the most important motivational triggers and it is important for the manager/ leader to find out what it is that will motivate each individual to move towards these goals.

Although some people are highly motivated, others fall into the trap of the self fulfilling expectancy - that is, they get what they think they will get. The aim of the leader in these cases is to try to change this kind of thinking and stop the individual from limiting their potential. It always helps to try to notice the good things that people are doing and to give praise, which in turn will help to raise their expectations of what they can really achieve.

Kim's final advice was that leaders should ask themselves what small changes they can implement, that will make the biggest difference to their organisation. It is often the small change that has the greatest impact.

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Practices urged to audit neutering data

News Story 1
 RCVS Knowledge has called on vet practices to audit their post-operative neutering outcomes.

It follows the release of the 2024 NASAN benchmarking report, which collates data from neutering procedures performed on dogs, cats and rabbits.

The benchmarking report enables practices in the UK and Ireland to compare their post-operative outcomes to the national average. This includes the rate of patients lost to follow-up, which in 2024 increased to 23 per cent.

Anyone from the practice can submit the data using a free template. The deadline for next report is February 2026.

Visit the RCVS Knowledge website to complete an audit. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
UK's BSE risk status downgraded

The WOAH has downgraded the UK's international risk status for BSE to 'negligible'.

Defra says that the UK's improved risk status recognises the reputation for having the highest standards for biosecurity. It adds that it demonstrates decades of rigorous animal control.

Outbreaks of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, also known as mad cow disease, have previously resulted in bans on Britain's beef exports.

The UK's new status could lead to expanded trade and better confidence in British beef.

Christine Middlemiss, the UK's chief veterinary officer, said: "WOAH's recognition of the UK as negligible risk for BSE is a significant milestone and is a testament to the UK's strong biosecurity measures and the hard work and vigilance of farmers and livestock keepers across the country who have all played their part in managing the spread of this disease.