Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Brussels calls for action on tail biting in pigs
Under EU legislation, tail docking or reduction of corner teeth must not be carried out routinely unless there is evidence of injuries to sows’ teats or to other pigs’ ears or tails.
Member states asked to develop plans to address the issue

EU member states have been asked to develop action plans outlining how they will tackle tail-biting in pigs.

Under EU legislation, tail docking or reduction of corner teeth must not be carried out routinely unless there is evidence of injuries to sows’ teats or to other pigs’ ears or tails.

Prior to carrying out tail docking, other measures must be taken to prevent tail biting and inadequate environmental conditions or management systems must be changed.

Georgina Crayford, senior policy advisor for the National Pig Association (NPA), attended a European Commission workshop on actions to prevent tail-biting and reduce tail docking.

“It became very clear at the meeting that the Commission is really focusing on this issue at the moment and it is now ramping up the pressure,” she said. “They have asked member states to provide an action plan by January 2018 outlining how they will improve controls on the prevention of tail-biting and avoidance of tail-docking.

“They are not expecting countries to completely stop tail-docking, but they want to see progress and will be conducting missions throughout 2018 to review progress and assess compliance with the legislation.”

The commission wants to see more evidence that farmers are implementing other measures before tail docking, she added.

“In particular, they feel that farmers should be reducing stocking density before docking otherwise they are in breach of the legislation. One of the Commission’s Veterinary Inspectors clearly said the argument sometimes used by farmers that they adhere to the minimum space allowance in the legislation holds no water.”

Governments were also encouraged to set up rural development programmes, accessing pillar two funding to support farmers in their efforts to stop tail docking.

However, Crayford said the NPA is keen to impress on Defra that funding made available to farmers must be flexible, in order to allow them to try a range of measures to stop tail docking, rather than focusing on straw provision and stocking density.

She added: “We will also do our best to ensure that Government’s approach is sensible and that Defra continues to acknowledge that tail-biting is a complex behaviour with no simple solution.”

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Practices urged to audit neutering data

News Story 1
 RCVS Knowledge has called on vet practices to audit their post-operative neutering outcomes.

It follows the release of the 2024 NASAN benchmarking report, which collates data from neutering procedures performed on dogs, cats and rabbits.

The benchmarking report enables practices in the UK and Ireland to compare their post-operative outcomes to the national average. This includes the rate of patients lost to follow-up, which in 2024 increased to 23 per cent.

Anyone from the practice can submit the data using a free template. The deadline for next report is February 2026.

Visit the RCVS Knowledge website to complete an audit. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
UK's BSE risk status downgraded

The WOAH has downgraded the UK's international risk status for BSE to 'negligible'.

Defra says that the UK's improved risk status recognises the reputation for having the highest standards for biosecurity. It adds that it demonstrates decades of rigorous animal control.

Outbreaks of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, also known as mad cow disease, have previously resulted in bans on Britain's beef exports.

The UK's new status could lead to expanded trade and better confidence in British beef.

Christine Middlemiss, the UK's chief veterinary officer, said: "WOAH's recognition of the UK as negligible risk for BSE is a significant milestone and is a testament to the UK's strong biosecurity measures and the hard work and vigilance of farmers and livestock keepers across the country who have all played their part in managing the spread of this disease.