Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Brussels calls for action on tail biting in pigs
Under EU legislation, tail docking or reduction of corner teeth must not be carried out routinely unless there is evidence of injuries to sows’ teats or to other pigs’ ears or tails.
Member states asked to develop plans to address the issue

EU member states have been asked to develop action plans outlining how they will tackle tail-biting in pigs.

Under EU legislation, tail docking or reduction of corner teeth must not be carried out routinely unless there is evidence of injuries to sows’ teats or to other pigs’ ears or tails.

Prior to carrying out tail docking, other measures must be taken to prevent tail biting and inadequate environmental conditions or management systems must be changed.

Georgina Crayford, senior policy advisor for the National Pig Association (NPA), attended a European Commission workshop on actions to prevent tail-biting and reduce tail docking.

“It became very clear at the meeting that the Commission is really focusing on this issue at the moment and it is now ramping up the pressure,” she said. “They have asked member states to provide an action plan by January 2018 outlining how they will improve controls on the prevention of tail-biting and avoidance of tail-docking.

“They are not expecting countries to completely stop tail-docking, but they want to see progress and will be conducting missions throughout 2018 to review progress and assess compliance with the legislation.”

The commission wants to see more evidence that farmers are implementing other measures before tail docking, she added.

“In particular, they feel that farmers should be reducing stocking density before docking otherwise they are in breach of the legislation. One of the Commission’s Veterinary Inspectors clearly said the argument sometimes used by farmers that they adhere to the minimum space allowance in the legislation holds no water.”

Governments were also encouraged to set up rural development programmes, accessing pillar two funding to support farmers in their efforts to stop tail docking.

However, Crayford said the NPA is keen to impress on Defra that funding made available to farmers must be flexible, in order to allow them to try a range of measures to stop tail docking, rather than focusing on straw provision and stocking density.

She added: “We will also do our best to ensure that Government’s approach is sensible and that Defra continues to acknowledge that tail-biting is a complex behaviour with no simple solution.”

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Vets launch new podcast for pet owners

News Story 1
 Two independent vets have launched a podcast to help owners strengthen their bond with pets. Dr Maggie Roberts and Dr Vanessa Howie, who have worked in both veterinary practice and major charities, are keen to use their experience to enable people to give pets a better life.

The venture, called Vets Talking Pets, provides advice and information on a range of topics, including how to select a suitable pet, where to obtain them and how to get the best out of your vet. Maggie and Vanessa will also discuss sensitive subjects, including end-of-life care, raw food diets and the cost of veterinary care.

The podcast can be found on all the usual podcast sites, including Podbean, Apple, Amazon Music and YouTube. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
VMD issues guidance on AVM-GSL packaging

The Veterinary Medicines Directorate (VMD) has shared advice on its requirements for medicines considered AVM-GSL.

The guidance explains the information that should be on the outer package, and sets out the typical maximum pack size for an AVM-GSL product. It also describes the user-friendly language, structure and phrases required on packaging and product leaflets.

AVM-GSL products do not require discussion between the purchaser and a veterinary professional. This means that clear product information is needed to support sales choices.

The information will be useful for submitting new products to the AVM-GSL category and lowering the distribution category of products from NFA-VPS to AVM-GSL.

The VMD's guidance can be accessed here.