Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Report highlights scale of dog attacks on livestock
Since September 2013, there have been 1705 recorded incidents of livestock worrying.

Working Group identifies challenges faced by police forces 

A new report highlighting the scale of dog attacks on livestock has been published by the National Police Chief’s Council (NPCC).

Dogs owners are not currently required to report to the police if their dog attacks livestock, and dog attacks are not treated as a ‘recordable crime’. As such, there is little data on the scale of the problem facing livestock owners and farmers.

Over the last 12 months, five police forces from across the UK have been taking part in a project looking at the true extent of livestock worrying. The forces, North Yorkshire, Devon and Cornwall, Sussex, North Wales and Hertfordshire, analysed data on their systems from September 2013 to 2017.

The investigation found that there were 1705 recorded incidents of livestock worrying and attacks in the five force areas. A total of 1928 animals were killed, and 1614 injured, at an estimated cost of £250,000.

It also found that 11 per cent of the incidents involved repeat offenders, e.g. owners whose dog had worried or caused damage to livestock before. In the majority of incidents, the dog owner was not present at the time of the attacks.

Following a review of the findings, the NPCC’s Wildlife and Rural Crime Working Group has identified a number of challenges faced by police forces when dealing with sheep worrying.

They note that many animals, such as llamas, ostriches, alpacas and emus, are susceptible to dog attacks but are not defined as livestock, meaning they are not covered by the law. They also point out that dog attacks are only unlawful in certain places. For example, if a dog attack occurs on a public lane, it is not considered unlawful.

“This project provides hard data showing livestock worrying is a very significant issue for farmers that impacts on their livelihoods,” said chief constable David Jones, NPCC’s lead for wildlife and rural crime.

“We need dog-owners to take responsibility for their animals – not just by putting their dogs on a lead when out walking, but by preventing them from escaping from home and causing damage to livestock.  We need livestock owners to report incidents so that we can gather intelligence and launch investigations.

He continued: "Above all, we need the powers to tackle this problem effectively and an overhaul of the outdated and sometimes ineffective rules surrounding livestock worrying”.

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Practices urged to audit neutering data

News Story 1
 RCVS Knowledge has called on vet practices to audit their post-operative neutering outcomes.

It follows the release of the 2024 NASAN benchmarking report, which collates data from neutering procedures performed on dogs, cats and rabbits.

The benchmarking report enables practices in the UK and Ireland to compare their post-operative outcomes to the national average. This includes the rate of patients lost to follow-up, which in 2024 increased to 23 per cent.

Anyone from the practice can submit the data using a free template. The deadline for next report is February 2026.

Visit the RCVS Knowledge website to complete an audit. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
UK's BSE risk status downgraded

The WOAH has downgraded the UK's international risk status for BSE to 'negligible'.

Defra says that the UK's improved risk status recognises the reputation for having the highest standards for biosecurity. It adds that it demonstrates decades of rigorous animal control.

Outbreaks of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, also known as mad cow disease, have previously resulted in bans on Britain's beef exports.

The UK's new status could lead to expanded trade and better confidence in British beef.

Christine Middlemiss, the UK's chief veterinary officer, said: "WOAH's recognition of the UK as negligible risk for BSE is a significant milestone and is a testament to the UK's strong biosecurity measures and the hard work and vigilance of farmers and livestock keepers across the country who have all played their part in managing the spread of this disease.