Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

AMR: EU ban on group use of prophylactics confirmed
Georgina Crayford, NPA’s senior policy advisor, said the changes could have major implications for the way pig health is managed.

NPA says there could be major implications for pig health

An EU ban on the prophylactic use of antibiotics in groups of animals has been confirmed.

Under the revised EU Regulation on Veterinary Medicinal Products, which comes into force in 2021, veterinary surgeons will only be able to prescribe prophylactic antibiotics for administration to individual animals.

The regulation states: ‘Antimicrobial medicinal products shall not be used for prophylaxis unless, in exceptional cases for the administration to an individual animal or a restricted number of animals when the risk of an infection or of an infectious disease is very high and the consequences are likely to be severe.

‘In such cases the use of antibiotic medicinal products for prophylaxis shall be limited to the administration to individual animal only, under the conditions laid down in the first sentence.’

In a recent letter to the UK’s chief veterinary officer, the National Pig Association and Pig Veterinary Society raised serious concerns about the plans.

Whilst agreeing that prophylaxis should only be deployed in ‘exceptional cases’, the two organisations warned that limiting this to individual animals is ‘unnecessary and risks seriously impacting pig health’.

Georgina Crayford, NPA’s senior policy advisor, said the changes could have major implications for the way pig health is managed.

“The NPA is working with RUMA, PVS and others to fully understand how this piece of legislation will be interpreted and what the implications will be for disease management in pigs,” she explained.

“We fully agree, of course, that prophylaxis should not be deployed routinely and only in exceptional circumstances. But we see no logic in prohibiting its use in groups of pigs, when it is deemed necessary for pigs’ health.”

 

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Practices urged to audit neutering data

News Story 1
 RCVS Knowledge has called on vet practices to audit their post-operative neutering outcomes.

It follows the release of the 2024 NASAN benchmarking report, which collates data from neutering procedures performed on dogs, cats and rabbits.

The benchmarking report enables practices in the UK and Ireland to compare their post-operative outcomes to the national average. This includes the rate of patients lost to follow-up, which in 2024 increased to 23 per cent.

Anyone from the practice can submit the data using a free template. The deadline for next report is February 2026.

Visit the RCVS Knowledge website to complete an audit. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
UK's BSE risk status downgraded

The WOAH has downgraded the UK's international risk status for BSE to 'negligible'.

Defra says that the UK's improved risk status recognises the reputation for having the highest standards for biosecurity. It adds that it demonstrates decades of rigorous animal control.

Outbreaks of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, also known as mad cow disease, have previously resulted in bans on Britain's beef exports.

The UK's new status could lead to expanded trade and better confidence in British beef.

Christine Middlemiss, the UK's chief veterinary officer, said: "WOAH's recognition of the UK as negligible risk for BSE is a significant milestone and is a testament to the UK's strong biosecurity measures and the hard work and vigilance of farmers and livestock keepers across the country who have all played their part in managing the spread of this disease.