Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Defra clarifies position on pig tail docking
"Pig farmers need to demonstrate at inspections that tail docking has been used as a last resort..."
Producers increasingly penalised for the practice - NPA 

Defra’s position on tail docking has been clarified, after an increasing number of pig producers are being penalised for the practice.

Routine tail docking is not permitted under EU law and may only be carried out when there is evidence of tail biting and all other measures to prevent this have been attempted.

At a recent National Pig Association (NPA) meeting, attendees heard about the case of a producer in the south west, who was handed a five per cent reduction to his BPS payment for tail docking. NPA said it understands court proceedings have been threatened in some cases.

Duncan Berkshire, president of the Pig Veterinary Society (PVS), explained: “This is about routine tail docking without all measures possible to prevent tail-biting being evident in the pens, including the provision of manipulable materials.”

Asked to clarify its position, a Defra spokesperson said: “Routine tail docking is not permitted by law. Pig farmers need to demonstrate at inspections that tail docking has been used as a last resort after taking the necessary steps, as described in the current welfare codes, to reduce the risks of tail biting. This includes actions to improve the pigs’ environment and their management.”

One of the concerns, according to Mr Berkshire, is that inspectors appear to have different interpretations of how producers are addressing the issue, with some regional variation reported.

The NPA said it is working actively to address the situation, collaborating with other parties to bring greater clarity to producers.

NPA chief executive Zoe Davies said: “We advise producers to do all they can to assess what would need to be done before they could stop tail docking, and to record any evidence. But we need to work more closely with Government to manage the transition more carefully and sensibly.

“Our concern is that producers will be panicked into not tail docking when previously there was no tail biting problem and create a much worse situation.”

NPA has set up a tail docking working group comprised of government, industry and academia to develop a joint approach to reduce tail docking.

Defra also consulted on a new statutory pig welfare code, which would provide more detailed information on the different factors causing tail biting, and advice on how to prevent it without docking tails. It is currently analysing the responses.

 

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Vets launch new podcast for pet owners

News Story 1
 Two independent vets have launched a podcast to help owners strengthen their bond with pets. Dr Maggie Roberts and Dr Vanessa Howie, who have worked in both veterinary practice and major charities, are keen to use their experience to enable people to give pets a better life.

The venture, called Vets Talking Pets, provides advice and information on a range of topics, including how to select a suitable pet, where to obtain them and how to get the best out of your vet. Maggie and Vanessa will also discuss sensitive subjects, including end-of-life care, raw food diets and the cost of veterinary care.

The podcast can be found on all the usual podcast sites, including Podbean, Apple, Amazon Music and YouTube. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
VMD issues guidance on AVM-GSL packaging

The Veterinary Medicines Directorate (VMD) has shared advice on its requirements for medicines considered AVM-GSL.

The guidance explains the information that should be on the outer package, and sets out the typical maximum pack size for an AVM-GSL product. It also describes the user-friendly language, structure and phrases required on packaging and product leaflets.

AVM-GSL products do not require discussion between the purchaser and a veterinary professional. This means that clear product information is needed to support sales choices.

The information will be useful for submitting new products to the AVM-GSL category and lowering the distribution category of products from NFA-VPS to AVM-GSL.

The VMD's guidance can be accessed here.