Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Fifth of meat samples contain DNA from other animals - survey
Some samples contained DNA from as many as four different animals. (Stock photo)

Levels consistent with ‘deliberate inclusion’, FSA says 

Over a fifth of meat samples tested in 2017 contained DNA from animals that were not specified in the labelling, the BBC has revealed.

The Food Standards Agency (FSA) collected 665 results from England, Wales and Northern Ireland - of which 145 were partly or wholly made up of unspecified meat. This is according to a freedom of information request by the BBC.

Samples came from 487 businesses, including restaurants and supermarkets.

FSA said the levels of contamination are consistent with ‘deliberate inclusion’. However, testing targeted businesses that were under suspicion of compliance issues.

In total, 73 of the contaminated samples were from retailers, including three supermarkets, while a further 50 were from restaurants and 22 from manufacturing or food processing plants.

Some samples contained DNA from as many as four different animals, while others had no trace of the meat on the label. Cow DNA was the most common contaminant, followed by pig, chicken, sheep and turkey.

Meat labelled as lamb was most likely to contain DNA from other animals, while mince meat was the most frequently mislabelled.

An FSA spokesperson is quoted by BBC News as saying the results are “not representative of the wider food industry”.

However, it is difficult to build a clearer picture of the wider industry, as less than half of local authorities submitted meat sampling data to the Food Surveillance System in 2017.

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Practices urged to audit neutering data

News Story 1
 RCVS Knowledge has called on vet practices to audit their post-operative neutering outcomes.

It follows the release of the 2024 NASAN benchmarking report, which collates data from neutering procedures performed on dogs, cats and rabbits.

The benchmarking report enables practices in the UK and Ireland to compare their post-operative outcomes to the national average. This includes the rate of patients lost to follow-up, which in 2024 increased to 23 per cent.

Anyone from the practice can submit the data using a free template. The deadline for next report is February 2026.

Visit the RCVS Knowledge website to complete an audit. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
UK's BSE risk status downgraded

The WOAH has downgraded the UK's international risk status for BSE to 'negligible'.

Defra says that the UK's improved risk status recognises the reputation for having the highest standards for biosecurity. It adds that it demonstrates decades of rigorous animal control.

Outbreaks of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, also known as mad cow disease, have previously resulted in bans on Britain's beef exports.

The UK's new status could lead to expanded trade and better confidence in British beef.

Christine Middlemiss, the UK's chief veterinary officer, said: "WOAH's recognition of the UK as negligible risk for BSE is a significant milestone and is a testament to the UK's strong biosecurity measures and the hard work and vigilance of farmers and livestock keepers across the country who have all played their part in managing the spread of this disease.