Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

New report sheds light on AMR bacteria in meat
The FSA says the risk of acquiring AMR-related infections is very low, assuming meat is cooked and handled correctly.
FSA study could inform future surveillance 

A new study has found antimicrobial resistance in a proportion of all types of bacteria examined in samples of chicken and pork.

The Food Standards Agency (FSA) tested 339 samples of raw chicken and 342 samples of raw pork mince from UK retailers. The findings will help to inform future surveillance of AMR in these foods.

Overall, resistance to the most clinically important antibiotics was generally seen more often in chicken than pork.

Key findings
  • A quarter of chicken samples tested positive for Campylobacter, of which 40.6 per cent were resistant to ciprofloxacin, 46.5 per cent to nalidixic acid and 61.4 per cent to tetracycline.
  • E. coli was detected in 49 per cent of chicken and 4.7 per cent of pork.
  • ESBL-producing E. coli was found in 10 per cent of retail chicken and 4.7 per cent of pork.
  • Klebsiella was detected in 37 per cent of pork mince samples and 6.5 per cent of chicken.
  • Enterococci was isolated more frequently from chicken (53 per cent) than pork mince (30 per cent). Resistance was rare with just one per cent of isolates resistant to vancomycin.
  • Salmonella was detected in 1.5 per cent of pork mince samples. All four isolates of S typhimurium were from the same processing plant. All were resistant to ampicillin and tetracycline and one to chloramphenicol. All had reduced susceptibility to sulfamethoxazole. The fifth isolate was identified as a strain of S Derby and had reduced susceptibility to sulfamethoxazole.

However, the FSA says the risk of acquiring AMR-related infections is very low, assuming meat is cooked and handled correctly.

Commenting on the findings, Steve Wearne, director of food policy at FSA, said: “The emergence and spread of AMR poses a significant global threat both in terms of public health and economic impact and we are determined to play our part in addressing this threat…

“As well as reducing antibiotic use on farms we also need to understand the role that food plays in AMR and we are working with the Quadram Institute in Norwich to understand how resistance arises and how resistant bacteria survive and are transmitted through the food chain.

"I am pleased that the food industry is also taking its stewardship role very seriously and is taking action on the O’Neill recommendations.”

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Vets launch new podcast for pet owners

News Story 1
 Two independent vets have launched a podcast to help owners strengthen their bond with pets. Dr Maggie Roberts and Dr Vanessa Howie, who have worked in both veterinary practice and major charities, are keen to use their experience to enable people to give pets a better life.

The venture, called Vets Talking Pets, provides advice and information on a range of topics, including how to select a suitable pet, where to obtain them and how to get the best out of your vet. Maggie and Vanessa will also discuss sensitive subjects, including end-of-life care, raw food diets and the cost of veterinary care.

The podcast can be found on all the usual podcast sites, including Podbean, Apple, Amazon Music and YouTube. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
VMD issues guidance on AVM-GSL packaging

The Veterinary Medicines Directorate (VMD) has shared advice on its requirements for medicines considered AVM-GSL.

The guidance explains the information that should be on the outer package, and sets out the typical maximum pack size for an AVM-GSL product. It also describes the user-friendly language, structure and phrases required on packaging and product leaflets.

AVM-GSL products do not require discussion between the purchaser and a veterinary professional. This means that clear product information is needed to support sales choices.

The information will be useful for submitting new products to the AVM-GSL category and lowering the distribution category of products from NFA-VPS to AVM-GSL.

The VMD's guidance can be accessed here.