Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Study highlights veterinary practice cleaning shortfalls
The research highlights the importance of veterinary cleaning surveillance.

Researchers use fluorescent dye to inform cleaning practices

A study by researchers in the USA has highlighted a number of cleaning shortfalls in the small animal hospital setting.

Researchers at Ohio State University found that key surfaces in small animal veterinary hospitals are unlikely to be satisfactorily cleaned and put animal and human health at risk.

Writing in the Journal of Small Animal Practice (JSAP), scientists describe how they used a fluorescent dye to tag pre-determined surfaces in a large veterinary teaching hospital. The dye was only visible under ultraviolet light and could be removed by regular cleaning.  


Between June and July 2014, some 4,900 surfaces were tagged and assessed 24 hours after. Researchers found that 50 per cent of surfaces were cleaned well enough so that the tag was completely removed. However, they also found that cleaning varied widely by hospital location and surface.
 
Their study revealed that, of the surfaces with primarily human contact, the most frequently cleaned were the handle to the dog walking area and the equipment cart (100 per cent of the tag removed). In contrast, examination equipment - including the otoscope, ophthalmoscope and swivel light - were the cleaned the least (2.5 per cent).

On surfaces that had primarily animal contact, researchers found that the ward cage interior was the most frequently cleaned (89 per cent), while the dog run interior was cleaned less often (23.1 per cent). In terms of location, the radiology area was cleaned frequently (77.5 per cent), while the small animal treatment area was the least frequently cleaned (43 per cent).

Researchers note that the overall proportion of surfaces satisfactorily cleaned were similar to that reported in previous studies. However, the findings for some hospital areas and surfaces differed.

JSAP editor Nicholas Jeffery said the research highlights the importance of veterinary cleaning surveillance in individual practices so that they can implement targeted interventions.

“With health-care-associated infections being a persistent problem in human and veterinary medicine, it is important that surfaces and equipment within the veterinary practice are adequately cleaned," he explained.

“This research demonstrates the potential use of a commercial fluorescent dye for veterinary cleaning surveillance to inform hospital cleaning practices.”

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Vets launch new podcast for pet owners

News Story 1
 Two independent vets have launched a podcast to help owners strengthen their bond with pets. Dr Maggie Roberts and Dr Vanessa Howie, who have worked in both veterinary practice and major charities, are keen to use their experience to enable people to give pets a better life.

The venture, called Vets Talking Pets, provides advice and information on a range of topics, including how to select a suitable pet, where to obtain them and how to get the best out of your vet. Maggie and Vanessa will also discuss sensitive subjects, including end-of-life care, raw food diets and the cost of veterinary care.

The podcast can be found on all the usual podcast sites, including Podbean, Apple, Amazon Music and YouTube. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
VMD issues guidance on AVM-GSL packaging

The Veterinary Medicines Directorate (VMD) has shared advice on its requirements for medicines considered AVM-GSL.

The guidance explains the information that should be on the outer package, and sets out the typical maximum pack size for an AVM-GSL product. It also describes the user-friendly language, structure and phrases required on packaging and product leaflets.

AVM-GSL products do not require discussion between the purchaser and a veterinary professional. This means that clear product information is needed to support sales choices.

The information will be useful for submitting new products to the AVM-GSL category and lowering the distribution category of products from NFA-VPS to AVM-GSL.

The VMD's guidance can be accessed here.