Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Study adds to evidence for dehorning black rhinos
“In an ideal world no one would want to remove arguably one of the most iconic features of a rhino" - Lucy Chimes, University of Bristol Veterinary School.
The procedure is carried out to protect species from poaching.

A new study has found no evidence that dehorning has a negative impact on black rhinos.

Black rhinos are listed as a critically endangered species by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), with poaching for their horns posing a constant threat to their survival.

A number of African country reserves now dehorn rhinos to act against poaching, yet few studies have explored the impacts of the process, particularly among the black rhino species.

Building on previous knowledge of population growth between dehorned and horned rhinos, researchers examined four sub-populations of black rhino in Namibia. Of these, three populations had undergone some form dehorning at least once, and one population had never been dehorned.

Specifically, the team measured the age of females at the birth of their first calf; average time between the birth of calves for each female; birth sex ratios, calf survival, life span and cause of death.

Their study revealed no statistically significant differences in key factors of population growth between dehorned or horned black rhinos - a finding that is encouraging for the continued use of dehorning as an anti-poaching technique.

It has previously been suggested that dehorning rhinos could impact upon their biology and behaviour, either through losing their horns or from the dehorning process itself - which requires the animal to be sedated. 

The study was led by researchers at the University of Bristol, together with the Save the Rhino Trust and the Namibian Ministry of Environment, Forestry and Tourism.

Lucy Chimes, former MSc student from the University of Bristol Veterinary School, said: “In an ideal world no one would want to remove arguably one of the most iconic features of a rhino, its horn, but unfortunately this is not an ideal world and relentless poaching has forced many reserves to resort to dehorning.

“Our study found there were no statistically significant differences in any of the measures of population productivity evaluated between dehorned and horned rhinos, which is reassuring for the use of dehorning as an anti-poaching deterrent in black rhinos.”

The study, ‘Effects of dehorning on population productivity in four Namibia sub-populations of black rhinoceros (Diceros bicornis bicornis)’, is published in the
European Journal of Wildlife Research.

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Practices urged to audit neutering data

News Story 1
 RCVS Knowledge has called on vet practices to audit their post-operative neutering outcomes.

It follows the release of the 2024 NASAN benchmarking report, which collates data from neutering procedures performed on dogs, cats and rabbits.

The benchmarking report enables practices in the UK and Ireland to compare their post-operative outcomes to the national average. This includes the rate of patients lost to follow-up, which in 2024 increased to 23 per cent.

Anyone from the practice can submit the data using a free template. The deadline for next report is February 2026.

Visit the RCVS Knowledge website to complete an audit. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
UK's BSE risk status downgraded

The WOAH has downgraded the UK's international risk status for BSE to 'negligible'.

Defra says that the UK's improved risk status recognises the reputation for having the highest standards for biosecurity. It adds that it demonstrates decades of rigorous animal control.

Outbreaks of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, also known as mad cow disease, have previously resulted in bans on Britain's beef exports.

The UK's new status could lead to expanded trade and better confidence in British beef.

Christine Middlemiss, the UK's chief veterinary officer, said: "WOAH's recognition of the UK as negligible risk for BSE is a significant milestone and is a testament to the UK's strong biosecurity measures and the hard work and vigilance of farmers and livestock keepers across the country who have all played their part in managing the spread of this disease.