Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Coalition urges Dangerous Dogs Act overhaul
The Coalition is calling for officials to focus on evidence-based solutions to prevent bite incidents from any dogs.

The law has been in force for 32 years.

A coalition is pushing for the Dangerous Dogs Act to be reviewed after recent calls to add the XL bully to the UK’s banned dogs list.

The Dog Control Coalition, consisting of the RSPCA, Dogs Trust, Battersea Dogs & Cats Home, Blue Cross, the British Veterinary Association, Hope Rescue, The Kennel Club and the Scottish SPCA, believe that this will not make the public safer and may hide a bigger problem.

If the calls are successful, the XL bully would join the list of dogs that it is illegal to own in the UK, which currently consists of the pit bull terrier, Japanese Tosa, dogo Argentino and fila Braziliero.

The Dangerous Dogs Act has now existed for 32 years, however the number of dog bite incidents has increased. In 2022/2023, NHS data showed a provisional 9,366 recorded dog bites – an increase on the 8,819 bites recorded the previous year.

The Coalition says that this indicates the current focus on identifying and banning certain breeds, rather than focusing on individual aggressive acts, has not been effective.

They warn that banning more breeds will see dogs destroyed based on how they look, rather than dealing with the causes of dangerous and aggressive dogs.

As a UK General Election approaches, the Coalition is calling for officials to focus on evidence-based solutions to prevent bite incidents from any dogs.

Dr Samantha Gaines, an RSPCA dog welfare expert, said: “Breed specific legislation has been in force now for 32 years and is still failing. We have been devastated by some recent dog bite incidents, which have been tragic events and highlight the need for urgent action and a change in approach.

“But simply adding another dog breed type to the already flawed approach of banning certain types of dog because of how they look clearly isn’t the answer.

“Any such move will just force charities to put to sleep more dogs and offer another layer to the false sense of security to the public that hasn't worked for 32 years - and won't suddenly start working now.”

The RSPCA, a member of the Coalition, is asking supporters to email their Member of Parliament and support an overhaul of the Dangerous Dogs Act, and a replacement of breed specific legislation.

Dr Gaines added: “We need to stop unfairly judging dogs because of how they look. With a General Election looming, it’s time politicians get serious about tackling dangerous dogs.”

Image (C) Shutterstock

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Practices urged to audit neutering data

News Story 1
 RCVS Knowledge has called on vet practices to audit their post-operative neutering outcomes.

It follows the release of the 2024 NASAN benchmarking report, which collates data from neutering procedures performed on dogs, cats and rabbits.

The benchmarking report enables practices in the UK and Ireland to compare their post-operative outcomes to the national average. This includes the rate of patients lost to follow-up, which in 2024 increased to 23 per cent.

Anyone from the practice can submit the data using a free template. The deadline for next report is February 2026.

Visit the RCVS Knowledge website to complete an audit. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
UK's BSE risk status downgraded

The WOAH has downgraded the UK's international risk status for BSE to 'negligible'.

Defra says that the UK's improved risk status recognises the reputation for having the highest standards for biosecurity. It adds that it demonstrates decades of rigorous animal control.

Outbreaks of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, also known as mad cow disease, have previously resulted in bans on Britain's beef exports.

The UK's new status could lead to expanded trade and better confidence in British beef.

Christine Middlemiss, the UK's chief veterinary officer, said: "WOAH's recognition of the UK as negligible risk for BSE is a significant milestone and is a testament to the UK's strong biosecurity measures and the hard work and vigilance of farmers and livestock keepers across the country who have all played their part in managing the spread of this disease.