Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Group campaigns as proposed shock collar ban date passes
The group is urging Defra not to U-turn on its promise of a ban.
Defra had announced the ban would be in place from 1 February.

Veterinary and animal welfare organisations are calling on the government to commit to its ban on hand-held electronic shock collars, after the proposed date for the ban passed without action.

The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) previously announced that the collars would be prohibited for use on dogs and cats in England from 1 February.

However no time was allocated to debate the proposed ban, which the organisations say has led to no further progress. They are now urging Defra not to U-turn on its promise of a ban.

The group of organisations, which includes Dogs Trust and the British Veterinary Association, has been campaigning against the use of shock collars for many years. This led to 51,000 members of the public supporting the campaign by writing to their MPs.

They also reference two separate polls, independently commissioned by The Kennel Club and RSPCA, which revealed that nine in ten adults supported an urgent ban on the use of shock collars.

Electronic shock collars are currently legal for use on any animal, in any situation that the handset bearer requires it.

They are often used to train pets, punishing unwanted behaviours by administering an electric shock to the animal’s neck. This is intended to teach the animal to be fearful of receiving a shock, and therefore avoiding that behaviour.

It is also used as a precaution to prevent dogs from livestock worrying, which can be dangerous for both the pet and the livestock.

However Dogs Trust says that the use of electronic shock collars can cause dogs to become anxious about their surroundings, leading them to become aggressive or avoidant of other people or things in their environment when they receive the shock.

The charity also refers to data from five police forces, which suggest that most livestock worrying incidents occur from unaccompanied dogs. It says that a more effective method of preventing livestock worrying is keeping the dog on a lead.

Speaking on behalf the group of organisations, Paula Boyden, veterinary director of Dogs Trust, said: “We are collectively calling on Defra not to U-turn on its promise to ban the sale and use of electric shock collars and to find the time to bring this ban into effect. There is simply no place or need for these cruel devices in modern pet training.”

A Defra spokesperson said: “The UK is a world leader on animal welfare and we are fully committed to maintaining and enhancing our strong track record, including delivering the ban on hand-controlled electric shock collars.”

Image © Shutterstock

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Practices urged to audit neutering data

News Story 1
 RCVS Knowledge has called on vet practices to audit their post-operative neutering outcomes.

It follows the release of the 2024 NASAN benchmarking report, which collates data from neutering procedures performed on dogs, cats and rabbits.

The benchmarking report enables practices in the UK and Ireland to compare their post-operative outcomes to the national average. This includes the rate of patients lost to follow-up, which in 2024 increased to 23 per cent.

Anyone from the practice can submit the data using a free template. The deadline for next report is February 2026.

Visit the RCVS Knowledge website to complete an audit. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
UK's BSE risk status downgraded

The WOAH has downgraded the UK's international risk status for BSE to 'negligible'.

Defra says that the UK's improved risk status recognises the reputation for having the highest standards for biosecurity. It adds that it demonstrates decades of rigorous animal control.

Outbreaks of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, also known as mad cow disease, have previously resulted in bans on Britain's beef exports.

The UK's new status could lead to expanded trade and better confidence in British beef.

Christine Middlemiss, the UK's chief veterinary officer, said: "WOAH's recognition of the UK as negligible risk for BSE is a significant milestone and is a testament to the UK's strong biosecurity measures and the hard work and vigilance of farmers and livestock keepers across the country who have all played their part in managing the spread of this disease.