Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Charity calls for tighter regulation on ‘dangerous’ exotic pets
There are concerns that keeping wild animals in domestic settings could cause transmission of zoonotic diseases.

Born Free says keeping dangerous pets threatens the safety of animals and the public.

A wildlife charity has called for tighter regulations on dangerous wild animals being kept as pets, after their research revealed 2,700 dangerous animals being kept privately in Great Britain.

The charity, Born Free, says that keeping these animals as pets not only threatens their welfare, but also puts the general public at increased risk.

Research conducted by the charity revealed that more than 200 wild cats and 250 primates were being kept privately in Great Britain, under license by the Dangerous Wild Animals Act 1976. There were also 400 venomous snakes kept as pets – which the charity says is ten times more than are kept in zoos.

Born Free has expressed their concern at these statistics, stating that keeping wild animals as pets contributes to considerable animal suffering.

They say that these undomesticated animals have complex physical, psychological and social needs, which can not be met in captivity. This can lead to the animals suffering poor health and psychological damage, further increasing their danger to humans.

Born Free says that demand for wild animals to be kept as pets could put additional pressure on the wild populations of species which are already under threat.

There are also concerns that keeping wild animals in domestic settings could cause transmission of zoonotic diseases from the animals to humans.

Dr Mark Jones, head of policy at Born Free, said: “The UK likes to claim to be at the forefront of efforts to protect nature and improve the welfare of animals, yet our legislation governing the keeping of and trade in exotic pets is woefully outdated.

“The Dangerous Wild Animals Act should be overhauled as a matter of urgency, in order to phase out the private keeping of those species that clearly don’t belong in people’s homes."

The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) says that they carefully inspect prospective owners of such species.

It says that the Dangerous Wild Animals Act had been reformed in 2007, 2010 and 2018 to ensure the Act was effective. The Animal Welfare Act 2006 also imposes prison sentences and fines on animal owners who do not provide for welfare needs.

A spokesperson from Defra said: “Anyone wishing to keep an animal covered by the Dangerous Wild Animals Act must be carefully vetted and apply for a licence which sets out strict conditions under which the animals must be kept.

“We keep this legislation under regular review to ensure it remains effective in keeping the public safe. We have also increased the maximum prison sentence for animal cruelty to five years, as well as bringing forward legislation to prohibit primates being kept as domestic pets.”

Image © Shutterstock

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Practices urged to audit neutering data

News Story 1
 RCVS Knowledge has called on vet practices to audit their post-operative neutering outcomes.

It follows the release of the 2024 NASAN benchmarking report, which collates data from neutering procedures performed on dogs, cats and rabbits.

The benchmarking report enables practices in the UK and Ireland to compare their post-operative outcomes to the national average. This includes the rate of patients lost to follow-up, which in 2024 increased to 23 per cent.

Anyone from the practice can submit the data using a free template. The deadline for next report is February 2026.

Visit the RCVS Knowledge website to complete an audit. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
UK's BSE risk status downgraded

The WOAH has downgraded the UK's international risk status for BSE to 'negligible'.

Defra says that the UK's improved risk status recognises the reputation for having the highest standards for biosecurity. It adds that it demonstrates decades of rigorous animal control.

Outbreaks of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, also known as mad cow disease, have previously resulted in bans on Britain's beef exports.

The UK's new status could lead to expanded trade and better confidence in British beef.

Christine Middlemiss, the UK's chief veterinary officer, said: "WOAH's recognition of the UK as negligible risk for BSE is a significant milestone and is a testament to the UK's strong biosecurity measures and the hard work and vigilance of farmers and livestock keepers across the country who have all played their part in managing the spread of this disease.