Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Study explores conflicts in brachycephalic PPCs
Discussing brachycephalic issues with pet owners is considered critical in the veterinary profession.

Vets are faced with moral dilemmas when advising pet owners.

A new study has revealed the moral conflicts and barriers that veterinary surgeons face when delivering pre-purchase consultations (PPCs) for flat-faced dogs.

The research, conducted by the Royal Veterinary College (RVC), has suggested that the veterinary profession needs to better support practices with educating pet owners about the issues with brachycephalic breeds.

Flat-faced breeds, such as French bulldogs and pugs, are believed to be popular with UK pet owners due to their exaggerated features. However, these features are closely linked with severe skin, eye and breathing difficulties which can be life-limiting.

Discussing these issues with prospective pet owners is considered to be critical by many veterinary professionals, from a clinical, moral and ethical perspective.

However the RVC has previously identified barriers to veterinary professionals warning potential owners of brachycephalic dogs, as owners with a close loyalty to the breeds may be unwilling to hear about the welfare issues.

This latest study, based on interviews with veterinary surgeons working with small animals, explored the structural and perceptual barriers to delivering PPCs for flat-faced dogs.

The findings highlighted limited time and resources for these PPCs, including competition for appointment availability which prioritises the ‘firefighting’ of the clinical issues of flat-faced dogs. There was also a perceived public distrust of the veterinary profession.

Many of the interviewees felt they had little or no power to overcome these barriers on an individual level. They also spoke of a moral conflict between their responsibilities to animal welfare and the wants of their clients and businesses, which compromised their integrity and autonomy.

As part of its study the RVC set out a series of recommendations for the sector, which included stronger veterinary leadership to support veterinary surgeons with overcoming these barriers.

It recommended that veterinary organisations, including the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons and the British Veterinary Association, establish a joint, public-facing consensus on the acceptability of breeding or acquiring flat-faced dogs, to avoid reliance on individual opinion.

It also suggested increased pressure on the stakeholders who perpetuate the crisis, and practical resourcing for facilitating PPCs more regularly.

Dr Rowena Packer, the lead author of the study, said: “As the brachycephalic crisis continues to prevail, the support of leading veterinary organisations is vital in providing a united voice regarding the known harms of brachycephaly and support in facilitating PPCs to ensure vets are protected, and potential owners are fully informed when it comes to acquiring decisions.”

The full study can be found in the journal Vet Record.

Image © Shutterstock

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Practices urged to audit neutering data

News Story 1
 RCVS Knowledge has called on vet practices to audit their post-operative neutering outcomes.

It follows the release of the 2024 NASAN benchmarking report, which collates data from neutering procedures performed on dogs, cats and rabbits.

The benchmarking report enables practices in the UK and Ireland to compare their post-operative outcomes to the national average. This includes the rate of patients lost to follow-up, which in 2024 increased to 23 per cent.

Anyone from the practice can submit the data using a free template. The deadline for next report is February 2026.

Visit the RCVS Knowledge website to complete an audit. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
UK's BSE risk status downgraded

The WOAH has downgraded the UK's international risk status for BSE to 'negligible'.

Defra says that the UK's improved risk status recognises the reputation for having the highest standards for biosecurity. It adds that it demonstrates decades of rigorous animal control.

Outbreaks of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, also known as mad cow disease, have previously resulted in bans on Britain's beef exports.

The UK's new status could lead to expanded trade and better confidence in British beef.

Christine Middlemiss, the UK's chief veterinary officer, said: "WOAH's recognition of the UK as negligible risk for BSE is a significant milestone and is a testament to the UK's strong biosecurity measures and the hard work and vigilance of farmers and livestock keepers across the country who have all played their part in managing the spread of this disease.