Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Scientists challenge health claims of vegan dog diet study
“By revisiting and further interrogating these data, we have been able to draw more nuanced insights” – Prof Barrett-Jolly.
Authors of new study claim that original conclusion “was not accurate”.

Scientists at the University of Liverpool have challenged the findings of a study which its authors claimed showed that a nutritionally-sound vegan diet is the healthiest diet for dogs.

Reinvestigating data from the original study, first published in 2022, Alex German and Richard Barrett-Jolley of the University of Liverpool concluded that the claim the authors made in favour of vegan diets was not backed up by the data.

The original study was among the first large-scale studies into the impact of vegan diets on dog health, surveying 2,639 dog owners about their pets’ diets and health. The findings, according to the study’s authors, showed that nutritionally-sound vegan diets are healthier and less hazardous for dogs than conventional meat and raw meat diets.

However, this conclusion has now been disputed. Prof German explained: “On first reading this paper in 2022, it was evident that the study exclusively relied upon owner survey data and had an observational design, meaning that the associations between diet type and dog health could only suggest a possible correlation and not causality.

“In other words, it was not accurate to conclude that ‘Nutritionally-sound vegan diets are the healthiest and least hazardous choices for owners to feed their pet dogs.’”

“Further, the statistical analyses used did not explore the effect of possible confounding from other variables, such as the age and breed of the dogs and owner variables including age, gender, education and diet.”

Prof German and Prof Barrett-Jolly conducted their own statistical analyses on the original dataset, focusing on owner opinions of dog health. They found that these owner opinions were most strongly associated with the age of the dog. Other variables, such as owner age and breed size, also featured.

In contrast, the researchers found that the association between a vegan diet and owner opinions of health was minimal.

Prof Barrett-Jolly added: “We know how seriously owners take their pet’s health. By revisiting and further interrogating these data, we have been able to draw more nuanced insights.

“Crucially, we cannot draw a firm conclusion as to what diet type is actually best for dogs; this was never possible given the nature of the original dataset and study design. However, we can conclude that variables other than dog diet are more strongly associated with owner opinions about the health of their dog.”

The new paper has been published in the journal PLOS ONE, which also published the original study.

Image © Shutterstock

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Strangles survey seeks views of horse owners

News Story 1
 With Strangles Awareness Week just around the corner (5-11 May), vets are being encouraged to share a survey about the disease with their horse-owning clients.

The survey, which has been designed by Dechra, aims to raise awareness of Strangles and promote best practices to prevent its transmission. It includes questions about horse owners' experiences of strangles, together with preventative measures and vaccination.

Respondents to the survey will be entered into a prize draw to win two VIP tickets to Your Horse Live 2025. To access the survey, click here 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
DAERA to reduce BVD 'grace period'

DAERA has reminded herd keepers of an upcoming reduction to the 'grace period' to avoid BVD herd restrictions.

From 1 May 2025, herd keepers will have seven days to cull any BVD positive or inconclusive animals to avoid restrictions being applied to their herd.

It follows legislation introduced on 1 February, as DAERA introduces herd movement restrictions through a phased approach. Herd keepers originally had 28 days to cull BVD positive or inconclusive animals.

DAERA says that, providing herd keepers use the seven-day grace period, no herds should be restricted within the first year of these measures.

Additional measures, which will target herds with animals over 30 days old that haven't been tested for BVD, will be introduced from 1 June 2025.

More information is available on the DAERA website.