Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Research links cancer in birds to clutch size
Scientists suggest this may be an 'evolutionary trade-off' between reproduction and survival.
Birds that laid more eggs had higher rates of cancer.

Research conducted by an international group of scientists has suggested a relationship between birds’ reproductive rates and their risk of cancer.

The study, one of the largest on cancer susceptibility across bird species, discovered that birds which laid more eggs per clutch tended to have higher rates of cancer than those reproducing less.

Although it is investigated in many mammals, cancer in birds has been less extensively studied. The research team from Arizona State University analysed over 5,700 bird necropsies across 108 avian species.

The researchers suggest that the relationship between reproduction and cancer susceptibility could highlight the ‘evolutionary trade-offs’ between reproduction and survival for the birds. They believe that this could be related to energy allocation, as reproducing limits the amount of energy available.

Like all other organisms, birds have limited energy resources that must be allocated across various functions. This means that, when more energy is focused on reproduction, there is less energy available for maintaining health.

Since some birds have high reproductive rates, and invest heavily in raising offspring, they may have less energy available for DNA repair – making them more susceptible to cancer.

These findings may also explain why some long-lived species which have fewer offspring and can invest more in self-maintenance have lower cancer rates. Meanwhile, species with higher reproductive rates and shorter lifespans may focus their energy on reproduction.

In contrast to expectations, the study did not identify a strong correlation between body size or lifespan and cancer risk.

This represents a phenomenon in biology known as ‘Peto’s paradox’. Although larger, longer-lived animals have more cells which could become cancerous, they still display lower cancer rates.

Stefania Kapsetaki, co-first author of the study, said: "It is interesting that depending on the reproductive trait that we focus on, the trade-off between reproduction and bodily maintenance is not always clear.

"For example, investing in a trait linked to increased reproduction does not always mean less investment in a trait linked with bodily maintenance.

"It is important to bear in mind that patterns of avian cancer prevalence are affected by multiple interacting components, some known and others yet to be discovered."

The full study can be found in the journal Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health.

Image © Shutterstock

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Practices urged to audit neutering data

News Story 1
 RCVS Knowledge has called on vet practices to audit their post-operative neutering outcomes.

It follows the release of the 2024 NASAN benchmarking report, which collates data from neutering procedures performed on dogs, cats and rabbits.

The benchmarking report enables practices in the UK and Ireland to compare their post-operative outcomes to the national average. This includes the rate of patients lost to follow-up, which in 2024 increased to 23 per cent.

Anyone from the practice can submit the data using a free template. The deadline for next report is February 2026.

Visit the RCVS Knowledge website to complete an audit. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
UK's BSE risk status downgraded

The WOAH has downgraded the UK's international risk status for BSE to 'negligible'.

Defra says that the UK's improved risk status recognises the reputation for having the highest standards for biosecurity. It adds that it demonstrates decades of rigorous animal control.

Outbreaks of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, also known as mad cow disease, have previously resulted in bans on Britain's beef exports.

The UK's new status could lead to expanded trade and better confidence in British beef.

Christine Middlemiss, the UK's chief veterinary officer, said: "WOAH's recognition of the UK as negligible risk for BSE is a significant milestone and is a testament to the UK's strong biosecurity measures and the hard work and vigilance of farmers and livestock keepers across the country who have all played their part in managing the spread of this disease.