Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Improved animal health could address climate crisis, research reveals
Parasites, mastitis and lameness all contributed to the emissions burden.
Poor animal health leads to increased greenhouse gas emissions.

New research from a collaboration of 16 global researchers has revealed the climate impact of poor farm animal health.

The group, including veterinary professionals, scientists and ecologists from 14 institutions and three continents, sought to address the climate impact of farm animals without reducing livestock animals or food production.

The findings suggest that poor health among farm animals, including infection and disease, could be contributing to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Common, low-grade infections and production diseases, such as parasites, mastitis and lameness, were considered accountable for a large part of the emissions burden.

However, the researchers say that, because these health issues are so common, they are not being tracked as closely as more high-profile disease outbreaks.

This means that these lower grade infections and diseases are also poorly represented when assessing GHG emissions.

Although there have been effective initiatives implemented to reduce emissions through improved animal health, they are often not acknowledged or measured in national inventories. This means that they might not receive the backing they need to continue being effective.

The researchers recommend that, through better focus and measurement of animal health, farmers and policymakers can significantly reduce GHG emissions without reducing food production.

The group says that a rigorous methodology is needed to estimate farm animals’ GHG emissions and the achievable benefits that improved health could lead to. They have developed a framework to quantify the relationship between animal health and GHG emissions and to account for positive action.

They suggest that this approach will not only tackle climate change, but also lead to cost-effective food production and enhanced animal welfare.

Frances Ryan, a co-author of the study, works at the Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Sciences’ Centre for Supporting Evidence-Based Interventions in Livestock (SEBI-Livestock).

Dr Ryan said: “Livestock are crucial to livelihoods around the world and play an especially important role for food security, and the provision of nutrient-dense food in the global south.

“Reducing emissions by improving animal health allows us to address environmental issues while protecting people who rely on livestock.”

The full study can be found in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

Image © Shutterstock

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Practices urged to audit neutering data

News Story 1
 RCVS Knowledge has called on vet practices to audit their post-operative neutering outcomes.

It follows the release of the 2024 NASAN benchmarking report, which collates data from neutering procedures performed on dogs, cats and rabbits.

The benchmarking report enables practices in the UK and Ireland to compare their post-operative outcomes to the national average. This includes the rate of patients lost to follow-up, which in 2024 increased to 23 per cent.

Anyone from the practice can submit the data using a free template. The deadline for next report is February 2026.

Visit the RCVS Knowledge website to complete an audit. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
UK's BSE risk status downgraded

The WOAH has downgraded the UK's international risk status for BSE to 'negligible'.

Defra says that the UK's improved risk status recognises the reputation for having the highest standards for biosecurity. It adds that it demonstrates decades of rigorous animal control.

Outbreaks of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, also known as mad cow disease, have previously resulted in bans on Britain's beef exports.

The UK's new status could lead to expanded trade and better confidence in British beef.

Christine Middlemiss, the UK's chief veterinary officer, said: "WOAH's recognition of the UK as negligible risk for BSE is a significant milestone and is a testament to the UK's strong biosecurity measures and the hard work and vigilance of farmers and livestock keepers across the country who have all played their part in managing the spread of this disease.