Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Ponds contaminated with harmful pet parasite treatments
Some ponds tested for over 20 times the threshold harmful for wildlife.
Study suggests more awareness needed among dog owners.

A study led by Imperial College London has revealed the contamination which dogs can cause by swimming in ponds.

Researchers discovered high levels of the pesticides imidacloprid and fipronil in several ponds at Hampstead Heath where dogs were permitted to swim.

Imidacloprid and fipronil are pesticides found in common flea and tick treatments used as a preventative measure on both dogs and cats. They were banned for agricultural use in 2018 due to their toxicity to bees and other insects.

However, there is now increasing concern that their use on pets is leading to environmental pollution, with these chemicals reaching the environment through household wastewater and dogs swimming in natural waters.

To investigate the impact that dog swimming has on environmental pollution, the team studied six ponds and six connecting streams in London’s Hampstead Heath. Hampstead Heath is known to have good biodiversity and is home to many rare and threatened species.

Researchers, including scientists from Imperial College London and the Royal Veterinary College, tested three ponds which dogs were allowed to swim in, three they were not, and the streams which connected to them.

In the ponds where dogs were permitted to swim, water analysis revealed the average concentrations of imidacloprid and fipronil to be 309 ng/L (nanograms per litre) and 32 ng/L respectively. This is over 20 times the thresholds recognised as harmful to invertebrate wildlife.

Where dogs were not permitted to swim, however, water analysis detected no imidacloprid or fipronil.

To assess how well the dangers of parasiticide contamination were understood, the team followed this up with a survey of 101 dog owners who had brought their dogs to Hampstead Heath.

The survey revealed that 86 per cent did not know that parasiticides could cause environmental harm. A third of respondents were also unaware that many parasiticides warn that dogs should not swim or be washed within a few days of treatment.

However, 94 per cent said they believed that protecting nature should be an important consideration when choosing treatments.

Lauren Yoder, from the Royal Veterinary College, said: "Dog owners can play an important part in reducing the overall impact on the water that dogs enjoy by checking if they really need to use these products.

“If more owners moved to a 'when needed' approach, then this parasiticide pollution could be reduced."

The full study can be found in the journal Science of the Total Environment.

Image © Shutterstock

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Practices urged to audit neutering data

News Story 1
 RCVS Knowledge has called on vet practices to audit their post-operative neutering outcomes.

It follows the release of the 2024 NASAN benchmarking report, which collates data from neutering procedures performed on dogs, cats and rabbits.

The benchmarking report enables practices in the UK and Ireland to compare their post-operative outcomes to the national average. This includes the rate of patients lost to follow-up, which in 2024 increased to 23 per cent.

Anyone from the practice can submit the data using a free template. The deadline for next report is February 2026.

Visit the RCVS Knowledge website to complete an audit. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
UK's BSE risk status downgraded

The WOAH has downgraded the UK's international risk status for BSE to 'negligible'.

Defra says that the UK's improved risk status recognises the reputation for having the highest standards for biosecurity. It adds that it demonstrates decades of rigorous animal control.

Outbreaks of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, also known as mad cow disease, have previously resulted in bans on Britain's beef exports.

The UK's new status could lead to expanded trade and better confidence in British beef.

Christine Middlemiss, the UK's chief veterinary officer, said: "WOAH's recognition of the UK as negligible risk for BSE is a significant milestone and is a testament to the UK's strong biosecurity measures and the hard work and vigilance of farmers and livestock keepers across the country who have all played their part in managing the spread of this disease.