Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Scientists call for review of pesticide flea treatments
The study found that nesting birds are commonly exposed to insecticides.

Study find high levels of veterinary insecticide in bird’s nests. 

Scientists are urging the government to review the environmental risk of pesticides used in flea and tick treatments after research found high levels of veterinary drugs in birds’ nests lined with animal fur.

The call from the University of Sussex comes in response to a study that found that nesting birds are commonly exposed to insecticides, including high levels of fipronil, imidacloprid and permethrin – all of which were linked to a higher number of dead offspring or unhatched eggs.

Fipronil and imidacloprid, applied topically in the form of shampoos, spot-on treatments or sprays, are widely applied to cats and dogs as a preventative measure against fleas and ticks. However, scientists now propose that the drugs should only be used if a cat or dog actually has them. 

Speaking to The Guardian, study lead Cannelle Tassin de Montaigu said the significant presence of harmful chemical could be highly destructive for UK bird populations. 

“Our research shows that based on the chemicals detected, veterinary flea and tick drugs are the most likely source of contamination. We undertook our research when it was safe to do so at the end of the breeding season, so the problem could in fact be much worse. 

“This raises questions about the environmental impact of veterinary drugs and calls for a comprehensive environmental risk assessment of veterinary treatments.”

In the study, published in Science of the Total Environment, researchers collected 103 nests from blue and great tits, which were lined with animal fur. 

They found that 100 per cent of the nests contained fipronil, banned for agricultural use in the UK, and 89 per cent contained imidacloprid, banned as a plant protection product in the EU. A further 89 per cent contained permethrin. 

The findings build on previous research that parasiticide products used on small animals are causing harmful pollution in UK rivers and ponds.

A total ban on the use of imidacloprid in agriculture is being considered by the UK government owing to its harmful effects on pollinators. However, this ban does not extend to veterinary treatments. 

Scientists found a higher number of unhatched eggs and/or dead offspring in nests with high prevalence of insecticide. 

Imae (C) Shutterstock.

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Practices urged to audit neutering data

News Story 1
 RCVS Knowledge has called on vet practices to audit their post-operative neutering outcomes.

It follows the release of the 2024 NASAN benchmarking report, which collates data from neutering procedures performed on dogs, cats and rabbits.

The benchmarking report enables practices in the UK and Ireland to compare their post-operative outcomes to the national average. This includes the rate of patients lost to follow-up, which in 2024 increased to 23 per cent.

Anyone from the practice can submit the data using a free template. The deadline for next report is February 2026.

Visit the RCVS Knowledge website to complete an audit. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
UK's BSE risk status downgraded

The WOAH has downgraded the UK's international risk status for BSE to 'negligible'.

Defra says that the UK's improved risk status recognises the reputation for having the highest standards for biosecurity. It adds that it demonstrates decades of rigorous animal control.

Outbreaks of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, also known as mad cow disease, have previously resulted in bans on Britain's beef exports.

The UK's new status could lead to expanded trade and better confidence in British beef.

Christine Middlemiss, the UK's chief veterinary officer, said: "WOAH's recognition of the UK as negligible risk for BSE is a significant milestone and is a testament to the UK's strong biosecurity measures and the hard work and vigilance of farmers and livestock keepers across the country who have all played their part in managing the spread of this disease.