Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Bigger animals have increased cancer risk, study confirms
Elephants' rapid evolution has meant they have managed to reduce their cancer risk.
Findings challenge belief that there is no link with size.

A study has challenged long-standing theories by revealing that larger animals do have an increased risk of developing cancer.

The findings challenge the idea of ‘Peto’s paradox’: a theory from 1977 that suggested that there was no correlation between animal size and cancer risk.

The new study saw researchers from three universities collaborate to examine cancer data from 263 species. This was spread across the four major animal groups: amphibians, birds, mammals and reptiles.

The data had been gathered from veterinary autopsies of 31 amphibians, 79 birds, 90 mammals and 63 reptiles. Using advanced statistical methods, researchers analysed the relationship between cancer rates and body sizes, while taking into account the different species involved.

Researchers discovered that, overall, bigger animals displayed a higher prevalence of benign and malignant tumours.

This finding proved to be consistent in all species, regardless of whether they naturally stop growing (birds and mammals) or grow throughout their lives (amphibians and reptiles).

However, the researchers also identified that rapid evolution was a contributing factor to cancer defence. Animals which have rapidly evolved to a large size over short evolutionary timescales also evolved improved mechanisms to control cell growth and prevent tumours.

This means that, despite being ten times bigger, elephants have approximately the same cancer risk as a tiger.

There were some outliers to the researchers’ theory though, where a subset of species had much more or much less cancer than expected for their body size.

The common budgie, which weighs less than 30g, was found to have cancer rates which were more than 40 times higher than expected for its body size. The naked mole rat, however, had almost no recorded rate of cancer.

Advances in modern medicine means that researchers were unable to apply this theory to humans.

Overall, the research revealed a trend of larger species recording higher cancer rates. However, it also highlighted the role of evolution in developing mechanisms for cellular defence.

George Butler, lead author of the research at University College London, said: “Finding which animals are naturally better at fighting off cancer opens exciting new paths for research.

“By studying these successful species, we can better understand how cancers develop and potentially discover new ways to fight the disease. This could lead to breakthrough treatments in the future."

The full study can be found in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Image © Shutterstock

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Practices urged to audit neutering data

News Story 1
 RCVS Knowledge has called on vet practices to audit their post-operative neutering outcomes.

It follows the release of the 2024 NASAN benchmarking report, which collates data from neutering procedures performed on dogs, cats and rabbits.

The benchmarking report enables practices in the UK and Ireland to compare their post-operative outcomes to the national average. This includes the rate of patients lost to follow-up, which in 2024 increased to 23 per cent.

Anyone from the practice can submit the data using a free template. The deadline for next report is February 2026.

Visit the RCVS Knowledge website to complete an audit. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
UK's BSE risk status downgraded

The WOAH has downgraded the UK's international risk status for BSE to 'negligible'.

Defra says that the UK's improved risk status recognises the reputation for having the highest standards for biosecurity. It adds that it demonstrates decades of rigorous animal control.

Outbreaks of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, also known as mad cow disease, have previously resulted in bans on Britain's beef exports.

The UK's new status could lead to expanded trade and better confidence in British beef.

Christine Middlemiss, the UK's chief veterinary officer, said: "WOAH's recognition of the UK as negligible risk for BSE is a significant milestone and is a testament to the UK's strong biosecurity measures and the hard work and vigilance of farmers and livestock keepers across the country who have all played their part in managing the spread of this disease.