Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Bigger animals have increased cancer risk, study confirms
Elephants' rapid evolution has meant they have managed to reduce their cancer risk.
Findings challenge belief that there is no link with size.

A study has challenged long-standing theories by revealing that larger animals do have an increased risk of developing cancer.

The findings challenge the idea of ‘Peto’s paradox’: a theory from 1977 that suggested that there was no correlation between animal size and cancer risk.

The new study saw researchers from three universities collaborate to examine cancer data from 263 species. This was spread across the four major animal groups: amphibians, birds, mammals and reptiles.

The data had been gathered from veterinary autopsies of 31 amphibians, 79 birds, 90 mammals and 63 reptiles. Using advanced statistical methods, researchers analysed the relationship between cancer rates and body sizes, while taking into account the different species involved.

Researchers discovered that, overall, bigger animals displayed a higher prevalence of benign and malignant tumours.

This finding proved to be consistent in all species, regardless of whether they naturally stop growing (birds and mammals) or grow throughout their lives (amphibians and reptiles).

However, the researchers also identified that rapid evolution was a contributing factor to cancer defence. Animals which have rapidly evolved to a large size over short evolutionary timescales also evolved improved mechanisms to control cell growth and prevent tumours.

This means that, despite being ten times bigger, elephants have approximately the same cancer risk as a tiger.

There were some outliers to the researchers’ theory though, where a subset of species had much more or much less cancer than expected for their body size.

The common budgie, which weighs less than 30g, was found to have cancer rates which were more than 40 times higher than expected for its body size. The naked mole rat, however, had almost no recorded rate of cancer.

Advances in modern medicine means that researchers were unable to apply this theory to humans.

Overall, the research revealed a trend of larger species recording higher cancer rates. However, it also highlighted the role of evolution in developing mechanisms for cellular defence.

George Butler, lead author of the research at University College London, said: “Finding which animals are naturally better at fighting off cancer opens exciting new paths for research.

“By studying these successful species, we can better understand how cancers develop and potentially discover new ways to fight the disease. This could lead to breakthrough treatments in the future."

The full study can be found in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Image © Shutterstock

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Strangles survey seeks views of horse owners

News Story 1
 With Strangles Awareness Week just around the corner (5-11 May), vets are being encouraged to share a survey about the disease with their horse-owning clients.

The survey, which has been designed by Dechra, aims to raise awareness of Strangles and promote best practices to prevent its transmission. It includes questions about horse owners' experiences of strangles, together with preventative measures and vaccination.

Respondents to the survey will be entered into a prize draw to win two VIP tickets to Your Horse Live 2025. To access the survey, click here 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
DAERA to reduce BVD 'grace period'

DAERA has reminded herd keepers of an upcoming reduction to the 'grace period' to avoid BVD herd restrictions.

From 1 May 2025, herd keepers will have seven days to cull any BVD positive or inconclusive animals to avoid restrictions being applied to their herd.

It follows legislation introduced on 1 February, as DAERA introduces herd movement restrictions through a phased approach. Herd keepers originally had 28 days to cull BVD positive or inconclusive animals.

DAERA says that, providing herd keepers use the seven-day grace period, no herds should be restricted within the first year of these measures.

Additional measures, which will target herds with animals over 30 days old that haven't been tested for BVD, will be introduced from 1 June 2025.

More information is available on the DAERA website.