Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel
Managing Down Under
Is there much difference between working in Australia and the UK?
What’s the difference between working in Australia and the UK? A report by the Chartered Management Institute and the Australian Institute of Management set about finding out.

The Quality of Working Life survey was based on over 2,500 respondents and found that:

Australian managers are more optimistic about their organisations performance as 65.5 per cent felt that their organisation was growing whilst only 48.7 per cent in the UK were as positive; and
71.2 per cent of Australian managers are satisfied with their job against 62.2 per cent of managers in the UK.

This may be as a result of the countries differing economic cycles and that the current economic slowdown had not impacted on Australia when the research was collected. It may also reflect the different age profiles of the respondents as 17.2 per cent of the Australian sample were under 30, compared to 8.3 per cent in the UK.

Management styles

The research shows that UK and Australian managers have reactive and bureaucratic as two of their top three prevailing management styles. Australian managers, however, are seen as more accessible and innovative compared to their UK counterparts.

UK research has demonstrated that accessible and empowering managerial styles were most associated with growing businesses and these styles are clearly yielding very positive results in Australia. These findings are further endorsed by this report, which found that Australian managers have substantially more trust and confidence in their senior managers – 62.3 per cent to the UK’s 46 per cent.  Furthermore 73.4 per cent of Australians felt they were fairly treated by their organisation, whereas only 59.6 per cent of UK managers felt the same way.

Australian managers are seen as more accessible and innovative compared to their UK counterparts.
Work-life balance

However, the work-life balance seems to be stronger in the UK as managers work fewer hours and have fewer health problems. The Australian manager has a longer working week (averaging 46.4 hours per week to the average UK manager’s 45.6 hours). Both sets of managers felt the long hours culture had a range of impacts on their health and Australian managers suffered more ill-health, including back pain, stomach bugs, influenza and viral infections, than UK managers. UK managers (41.2 per cent) are far more likely to be offered healthcare insurance than their Australian counterparts (17.2 per cent) and more likely to be offered sabbaticals, subsidised gym/sports facilities and health screenings/personal evaluation of health risks.

Ruth Spellman, Chief Executive of the Chartered Management Institute, says “Clearly management styles have a significant impact on morale and business performance. This report demonstrates how managers and leaders are viewed differently in the UK and in Australia with the Australians being more positive about senior management and enjoying higher levels of job satisfaction. The importance of accessible and empowering working environments is demonstrated by this survey.”

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Practices urged to audit neutering data

News Story 1
 RCVS Knowledge has called on vet practices to audit their post-operative neutering outcomes.

It follows the release of the 2024 NASAN benchmarking report, which collates data from neutering procedures performed on dogs, cats and rabbits.

The benchmarking report enables practices in the UK and Ireland to compare their post-operative outcomes to the national average. This includes the rate of patients lost to follow-up, which in 2024 increased to 23 per cent.

Anyone from the practice can submit the data using a free template. The deadline for next report is February 2026.

Visit the RCVS Knowledge website to complete an audit. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
UK's BSE risk status downgraded

The WOAH has downgraded the UK's international risk status for BSE to 'negligible'.

Defra says that the UK's improved risk status recognises the reputation for having the highest standards for biosecurity. It adds that it demonstrates decades of rigorous animal control.

Outbreaks of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, also known as mad cow disease, have previously resulted in bans on Britain's beef exports.

The UK's new status could lead to expanded trade and better confidence in British beef.

Christine Middlemiss, the UK's chief veterinary officer, said: "WOAH's recognition of the UK as negligible risk for BSE is a significant milestone and is a testament to the UK's strong biosecurity measures and the hard work and vigilance of farmers and livestock keepers across the country who have all played their part in managing the spread of this disease.