Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel
Welsh badger vaccination decision criticised
Policy slammed as 'financial negligence'

The decision by the Welsh Government to pursue a policy of vaccinating badgers in an attempt to control the spread of Bovine Tuberculosis (bTB) instead of culling has been sharply criticised as 'financial negligence' after the Welsh Government's own figures have revealed that the policy would lead to a net cost to the taxpayer of approximately £3.4 million.

Figures submitted to the Environment and Sustainability Minister John Griffiths estimated that a cull in the North Pembrokeshire Intensive Action Area would cost approximately £4.9 million but would save “at least £5,021,090” due to the reduced need for compensation following the slaughter of infected animals. However, the vaccination policy has been estimated to cost £5.7 million while only saving an estimated £2.3 million, leading to a £3.4 million net cost.

Commenting, Farmers Union of Wales (FAW) TB Spokesman Brian Walters said “As time has gone on the impact of culling has been found to be far more beneficial than some scientists had anticipated, making it at least cost-neutral, while at the same time saving the lives of cattle and preventing a great deal of heartache for farming families. The fact that the Welsh Government is now prepared to opt for a more expensive and less effective policy which will lead to a loss of £3.5 million to the taxpayer and the needless slaughter of thousands of cattle, rather than pursue a policy which science and economics tells us is best for Wales, speaks for itself. The decision is not only a betrayal of farmers but also a betrayal of taxpayers.” 

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Practices urged to audit neutering data

News Story 1
 RCVS Knowledge has called on vet practices to audit their post-operative neutering outcomes.

It follows the release of the 2024 NASAN benchmarking report, which collates data from neutering procedures performed on dogs, cats and rabbits.

The benchmarking report enables practices in the UK and Ireland to compare their post-operative outcomes to the national average. This includes the rate of patients lost to follow-up, which in 2024 increased to 23 per cent.

Anyone from the practice can submit the data using a free template. The deadline for next report is February 2026.

Visit the RCVS Knowledge website to complete an audit. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
UK's BSE risk status downgraded

The WOAH has downgraded the UK's international risk status for BSE to 'negligible'.

Defra says that the UK's improved risk status recognises the reputation for having the highest standards for biosecurity. It adds that it demonstrates decades of rigorous animal control.

Outbreaks of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, also known as mad cow disease, have previously resulted in bans on Britain's beef exports.

The UK's new status could lead to expanded trade and better confidence in British beef.

Christine Middlemiss, the UK's chief veterinary officer, said: "WOAH's recognition of the UK as negligible risk for BSE is a significant milestone and is a testament to the UK's strong biosecurity measures and the hard work and vigilance of farmers and livestock keepers across the country who have all played their part in managing the spread of this disease.