Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel
Charity watchdog meets with RSPCA
Commission discusses charity's approach to prosecutions

The Charity Commission has told senior executives of the RSPCA that any decision to prosecute must be a "reasonable and effective use of charity resources".

The comments came at a meeting called by the commission to discuss "the RSPCA's approach to prosecutions in general, and the recent prosecution of the Heythrop hunt in particular".

It emerged last month that the Uk's biggest charity had spent £326,000 on the prosecution – nearly 10 times the cost of the defence's legal bill. The expenditure was described as "staggering" by a judge.

It was reported that the charity payed for external firms of lawyers for the prosecution, despite the fact that it has its own legal team.

The commission said: "If considering a prosecution, charities must consider whether bringing a prosecution is a reasonable and effective use of the charity’s resources, what the prospects of success are, and whether the public interest is served by a prosecution.”

The meeting was prompted by Simon Hart MP who complained that the RSPCA's 18 trustees had breached a duty of prudence by agreeing to fund the prosecution. His views were reiterated by Lord Heseltine.

Mr Hart also said the commission's comments will be seen as a "veiled rebuke" against the prosecution of the prime minister's local hunt.

"We will be asking the Charity Commission to clarify whether it quizzed the charity as to why it failed in its ‘duty of prudence’ by spending a third of a million pounds on a single case when it could have achieved the same aim by a much more cost effective route."

A spokesperson for the RSPCA said: “RSPCA and Charity Commission executives met… to discuss the RSPCA’s approach to prosecutions. The Charity Commission has expressed no concern about the decisions made by the RSPCA, including the recent prosecution of the Heythrop hunt.

“The RSPCA welcomed and was unsurprised by this outcome. The Charity Commission has confirmed that it was not investigating the RSPCA and this is still the case.”

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Submissions open for BSAVA Clinical Research Abstracts 2026

News Story 1
 The BSAVA has opened submissions for the BSAVA Clinical Research Abstracts 2026.

It is an opportunity for applicants to present new research on any veterinary subject, such as the preliminary results of a study, discussion of a new technique or a description of an interesting case.

They must be based on high-quality clinical research conducted in industry, practice or academia, and summarised in 250 words.

Applications are welcome from vets, vet nurses, practice managers, and students.

Submissions are open until 6 March 2026. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
Survey seeks ruminant sector views on antimicrobial stewardship

A new survey is seeking views of people working in the UK ruminant sector on how to tackle the challenge of demonstrating responsible antibiotic stewardship.

Forming part of a wider, collaborative initiative, the results will help identify the types of data available so that challenges with data collection can be better understood and addressed.

Anyone working in the UK farming sector, including vets and farmers,is encouraged to complete the survey, which is available at app.onlinesurveys.jisc.ac.uk