Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel
NFU raises questions about RSPCA role
Union calls for charity to clarify its role at Ramsgate following report

Following the AHVLA report on the events at the port of Ramsgate last year, the National Farmers Union (NFU) has called for the RSPCA to clarify its role at the port.

It is felt that the recent report highlights confusion between the AHVLA and RSPCA over how to handle the incident. The timeline of events issued by the agency along with the report details the agency's intention to transport the vehicle in question to contingency premises 24 miles from Ramsgate. The RSPCA however objected to the proposal, and "informed the AHVLA inspector that they (the RSPCA)...were not prepared to allow the use of a vehicle that was unsuitable and overstocked, to transport the animals to the emergency facility."

Deputy president of the NFU Meurig Raymond claimed the RSPCA "appeared to have asserted significant influence over Government officials on the ground," during the incident which resulted in more than forty sheep having to be euthanised.

Mr Raymond insisted: "It is highly concerning that, although the RSPCA has no official role at the port, from an early stage, they were making objections to agreed contingency plans, making interventions from their legal team and, within an hour of a problem being found, they had ‘instructed’ AHVLA officers to unload animals at the port, despite RSPCA previously highlighting the lack of suitable facilities for handling animals."

The RSPCA however has defended its role during the incident, insisting the report "clearly states that all the key decisions on the day were taken by the competent authorities; AHVLA officers." The charity referred to its objection to the initial contingency plan as "well-founded" as a "fist-sized gap" was later found between the the deck floor and the shell of the vehicle, posing a significant risk to the animals.

The AHVLA timeline describes events from the inspection of the first vehicle at the port at 8:35am, to the arrival of the replacement vehicle at 1:00am the following morning, during which several difficulties are reported in implementing a contingency plan. As a result of the AHVLA's recent report, various alterations have been made to procedures to prevent a repeat of the incident.

To view the timeline of events click here.

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Vets launch new podcast for pet owners

News Story 1
 Two independent vets have launched a podcast to help owners strengthen their bond with pets. Dr Maggie Roberts and Dr Vanessa Howie, who have worked in both veterinary practice and major charities, are keen to use their experience to enable people to give pets a better life.

The venture, called Vets Talking Pets, provides advice and information on a range of topics, including how to select a suitable pet, where to obtain them and how to get the best out of your vet. Maggie and Vanessa will also discuss sensitive subjects, including end-of-life care, raw food diets and the cost of veterinary care.

The podcast can be found on all the usual podcast sites, including Podbean, Apple, Amazon Music and YouTube. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
VMD issues guidance on AVM-GSL packaging

The Veterinary Medicines Directorate (VMD) has shared advice on its requirements for medicines considered AVM-GSL.

The guidance explains the information that should be on the outer package, and sets out the typical maximum pack size for an AVM-GSL product. It also describes the user-friendly language, structure and phrases required on packaging and product leaflets.

AVM-GSL products do not require discussion between the purchaser and a veterinary professional. This means that clear product information is needed to support sales choices.

The information will be useful for submitting new products to the AVM-GSL category and lowering the distribution category of products from NFA-VPS to AVM-GSL.

The VMD's guidance can be accessed here.