Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Update on bTB vaccine

MPs warn vaccine is not a complete solution

In a report published on June 5, the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee (EFRACom), warned that vaccination will not provide a complete solution to bovine TB (bTB).

Launching the report into the progress of a vaccine, EFRACom chair Anne McIntosh said vaccination is expensive, does not guarantee protection and will not on its own solve the problems caused by bTB.

"The Government is right to invest millions of pounds in developing vaccines against bovine TB. We should use every tool to combat this disease, but vaccination alone will not, at least in the short-term, provide a complete solution.

"Vaccines have no impact on already infected animals, offer a range of protection to those that aren’t infected, and will be expensive to deploy."

Small-scale studies in Ethiopia and Mexico have found the protective effect of a cattle vaccine to be 56-68 per cent. EFRACom warn that this is not a high enough level of protection to immediately solve the problem.

The injectable badger vaccine, which has been available since 2010, "could create a healthier badger population", according to Ms McIntosh. It is, however, expensive, she added, meaning it should be used in areas where it will have the most impact.

An oral baited badger vaccine is felt to be "the most likely way to create a healthy badger population," offering a cheaper and more practical alternative to vaccination.

Concluding, Ms McIntosh called on the government to investigate whether the gamma interferon test - a blood test that is more sensitive than the skin test currently relied upon - could be used more widely to test for bTB, despite the cost.

She added that ongoing research projects could make a real difference in eradicating the disease in the UK, and the government's continuing investment in this research is crucial.

 

Related News
Reseach offers hope for bTB vaccine
Cattle bTB vaccine unlikely until 2023

 

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Practices urged to audit neutering data

News Story 1
 RCVS Knowledge has called on vet practices to audit their post-operative neutering outcomes.

It follows the release of the 2024 NASAN benchmarking report, which collates data from neutering procedures performed on dogs, cats and rabbits.

The benchmarking report enables practices in the UK and Ireland to compare their post-operative outcomes to the national average. This includes the rate of patients lost to follow-up, which in 2024 increased to 23 per cent.

Anyone from the practice can submit the data using a free template. The deadline for next report is February 2026.

Visit the RCVS Knowledge website to complete an audit. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
UK's BSE risk status downgraded

The WOAH has downgraded the UK's international risk status for BSE to 'negligible'.

Defra says that the UK's improved risk status recognises the reputation for having the highest standards for biosecurity. It adds that it demonstrates decades of rigorous animal control.

Outbreaks of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, also known as mad cow disease, have previously resulted in bans on Britain's beef exports.

The UK's new status could lead to expanded trade and better confidence in British beef.

Christine Middlemiss, the UK's chief veterinary officer, said: "WOAH's recognition of the UK as negligible risk for BSE is a significant milestone and is a testament to the UK's strong biosecurity measures and the hard work and vigilance of farmers and livestock keepers across the country who have all played their part in managing the spread of this disease.